Literature DB >> 10781275

Changes in the auditory evoked potentials and the bispectral index following propofol or propofol and alfentanil.

I A Iselin-Chaves1, H E El Moalem, T J Gan, B Ginsberg, P S Glass.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Midlatency auditory evoked potentials (MLAEP) show graded changes with increasing doses of hypnotics but little change with opioids. The effect of their combination on the MLAEP was evaluated. Also, the bispectral index (BIS) was compared with the ability of MLAEP to correlate with sedation and predict loss of consciousness.
METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive stepped increases in propofol concentration (10 subjects) or propofol plus alfentanil 100 ng/ml (10 subjects). At baseline and at each targeted effect site concentration the mean MLAEP, BIS, measures of sedation, and drug concentration were obtained. The relation among MLAEP, BIS, and sedation score was determined. The prediction probability (Pk) was calculated and compared for BIS and MLAEP.
RESULTS: The BIS and MLAEP patterns showed significant changes (Pa and Nb decreased in amplitude and increased in latency) with increasing level of sedation (P < 0.0001). The BIS correlated better with sedation scores (0.884) than did the MLAEP (P < 0.05). Pa and Nb latencies showed the best correlation with sedation levels (0.685 and 0.658, respectively). The addition of alfentanil did not affect the relation between MLAEP and loss of consciousness (P > 0.15). The BIS (Pk = 0.952) was a better predictor of loss of consciousness than were Pa and Nb amplitude (P < 0.05) but were comparable to Pa and Nb latency (Pk = 0.869 and 0. 873, respectively).
CONCLUSION: MLAEP changes, like the BIS, correlate well with increasing sedation produced by propofol, and these changes in the MLAEP are independent of the presence of an opioid. Among all the MLAEP parameters, Pa and Nb latencies are the best predictors of increasing sedation and loss of consciousness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10781275     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  11 in total

1.  N100 auditory potential and electroencephalogram discriminate propofol-induced sedation levels.

Authors:  Heidi Yppärilä; Ikka Korhonen; Mika Tarvainen; Tadeusz Musialowicz; Stephan M Jakob; Juhani Partanen
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.

Authors:  Anthony G Messina; Michael Wang; Marshall J Ward; Chase C Wilker; Brett B Smith; Daniel P Vezina; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-18

3.  The Use of Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) as Methodology for Evaluating Sedation Level in Propofol-Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure.

Authors:  Michele Arigliani; Domenico M Toraldo; Enrico Ciavolino; Caterina Lattante; Luana Conte; Serena Arima; Caterina Arigliani; Antonio Palumbo; Michele De Benedetto
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Change in auditory evoked potential index and bispectral index during induction of anesthesia with anesthetic drugs.

Authors:  Sachiko Matsushita; Shinya Oda; Kei Otaki; Masaki Nakane; Kaneyuki Kawamae
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  The optimal effect-site concentration of sufentanil for laryngeal mask insertion during induction with target-controlled propofol infusion at 4.0 μg/mL.

Authors:  Roshdi R Al-Metwalli
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04

6.  Efficacy of the bispectral index and Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale in monitoring sedation during spinal anesthesia: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Tae Wan Lim; Yi Hwa Choi; Jong Yeop Kim; Jong Bum Choi; Soo Kyung Lee; Eun Ji Youn; Jun Suck Lee
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2019-12-25       Impact factor: 1.671

7.  Latency of auditory evoked potential monitoring the effects of general anesthetics on nerve fibers and synapses.

Authors:  Bowan Huang; Feixue Liang; Lei Zhong; Minlin Lin; Juan Yang; Linqing Yan; Jinfan Xiao; Zhongju Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Monitoring sedation for bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients by using the Ramsay sedation scale versus auditory-evoked potentials.

Authors:  Chien-Wei Hsu; Shu-Fen Sun; Kuo-An Chu; David Lin Lee; Kam-Fai Wong
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.317

9.  POCD in patients receiving total knee replacement under deep vs light anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ruixue Hou; Hong Wang; Lianhua Chen; Yimin Qiu; Shitong Li
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.708

10.  Bispectral index to guide induction of anesthesia: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Dirk Rüsch; Christian Arndt; Leopold Eberhart; Scarlett Tappert; Dennis Nageldick; Hinnerk Wulf
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.