Literature DB >> 10780649

Nutritional value of enzyme- or sodium hydroxide-treated feathers from dead hens.

W K Kim1, P H Patterson.   

Abstract

Two feather digestion processes to remove the feathers from the carcasses of dead hens were evaluated for their impact on the nutritional quality of the resulting feather meal. There were three treatments: control (untreated feathers), a feather-digesting enzyme, and NaOH treatment. Both enzyme- and NaOH-treated feathers were easily separated from the hen carcasses. The CP level of enzyme-treated feathers after autoclaving (49.90%) was significantly less than the control and NaOH-treated feathers (94.48 and 87.31%, respectively) because of elevated ether extract levels resulting from skin and abdominal fat release during the 12-h enzyme incubation. Before autoclaving, pepsin digestibilities of enzyme- and NaOH-treated feathers were significantly higher than the control. However, after autoclaving, no significant difference was found in pepsin digestibility between the control and enzyme treatments or control and NaOH treatments. The typical limiting amino acids, methionine, lysine, and histidine, in feathers were present at greater levels in the resulting enzyme-feather meal (E-FM) compared with the NaOH-feather meal (N-FM) or control-feather meal (C-FM) on a percentage of CP basis. Cystine levels, however, were significantly lower in the E-FM and N-FM compared with that of the C-FM. In chick bioassays, no significant differences were found in protein efficiency ratio (PER) and net protein ratio (NPR) among C-FM, E-FM, and N-FM. The AMEn of E-FM (4.52 kcal/g) was significantly higher than the C-FM (3.58) or N-FM (2.79). These findings indicated that although enzyme treatment could improve the nutritional quality of feathers from dead hens, NaOH treatment was a more rapid means of separating feathers from the carcass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10780649     DOI: 10.1093/ps/79.4.528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  7 in total

Review 1.  Chicken Feather Waste Hydrolysate as a Superior Biofertilizer in Agroindustry.

Authors:  Ranjeeta Bhari; Manpreet Kaur; Ram Sarup Singh
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Cysteic Acid in Dietary Keratin is Metabolized to Glutathione and Liver Taurine in a Rat Model of Human Digestion.

Authors:  Frances M Wolber; Michelle McGrath; Felicity Jackson; Kim Wylie; Anne Broomfield
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 3.  Processing of ingredients and diets and effects on nutritional value for pigs.

Authors:  Oscar Javier Rojas; Hans Henrik Stein
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  Effect of keratinase on ileal amino acid digestibility in five feedstuffs fed to growing pigs.

Authors:  Chengfei Huang; Dongli Ma; Jianjun Zang; Bo Zhang; Brian Sun; Ling Liu; Shuai Zhang
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Keratinase improves the growth performance, meat quality and redox status of broiler chickens fed a diet containing feather meal.

Authors:  Kai-Lin Xu; Guo-Xin Gong; Miao Liu; Lu Yang; Ze-Jing Xu; Si Gao; Meng-Yi Xiao; Tao Ren; Bing-Ji Zhao; Mahmoud M Khalil; Ling Zhao; Lv-Hui Sun
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  In vitro and in vivo evaluation of protein quality of enzymatic treated feather meals.

Authors:  Warintorn Eaksuree; Akkharadet Prachayakitti; Tewa Upathanpreecha; Rutjawate Taharnklaew; Sunee Nitisinprasert; Suttipun Keawsompong
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-07-04

Review 7.  Progress in Microbial Degradation of Feather Waste.

Authors:  Qingxin Li
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.