Literature DB >> 10779352

Identification of a novel E2F3 product suggests a mechanism for determining specificity of repression by Rb proteins.

G Leone1, F Nuckolls, S Ishida, M Adams, R Sears, L Jakoi, A Miron, J R Nevins.   

Abstract

The tumor suppressor function of Rb is intimately related to its ability to interact with E2F and repress the transcription of E2F target genes. Here we describe a novel E2F product that specifically interacts with Rb in quiescent cells. This novel E2F, which we term E2F3b, is encoded by a unique mRNA transcribed from an intronic promoter within the E2F3 locus. The E2F3b RNA differs from the previously characterized E2F3 RNA, which we now term E2F3a, by the utilization of a unique coding exon. In contrast to the E2F3a product that is tightly regulated by cell growth, the E2F3b product is expressed equivalently in quiescent and proliferating cells. But, unlike the E2F4 and E2F5 proteins, which are also expressed in quiescent cells and form complexes with the p130 protein, the E2F3b protein associates with Rb and represents the predominant E2F-Rb complex in quiescent cells. Thus, the previously described specificity of Rb function as a transcriptional repressor in quiescent cells coincides with the association of Rb with this novel E2F product.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10779352      PMCID: PMC85655          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.20.10.3626-3632.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  30 in total

1.  E2F: a link between the Rb tumor suppressor protein and viral oncoproteins.

Authors:  J R Nevins
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 2.  The regulation of E2F by pRB-family proteins.

Authors:  N Dyson
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Subunit composition determines E2F DNA-binding site specificity.

Authors:  Y Tao; R F Kassatly; W D Cress; J M Horowitz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Distinct roles for E2F proteins in cell growth control and apoptosis.

Authors:  J DeGregori; G Leone; A Miron; L Jakoi; J R Nevins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The accumulation of an E2F-p130 transcriptional repressor distinguishes a G0 cell state from a G1 cell state.

Authors:  E J Smith; G Leone; J DeGregori; L Jakoi; J R Nevins
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Cellular targets for activation by the E2F1 transcription factor include DNA synthesis- and G1/S-regulatory genes.

Authors:  J DeGregori; T Kowalik; J R Nevins
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 7.  The retinoblastoma protein and cell cycle control.

Authors:  R A Weinberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-05-05       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 8.  Cyclins and cancer. II: Cyclin D and CDK inhibitors come of age.

Authors:  T Hunter; J Pines
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1994-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Altered cell cycle kinetics, gene expression, and G1 restriction point regulation in Rb-deficient fibroblasts.

Authors:  R E Herrera; V P Sah; B O Williams; T P Mäkelä; R A Weinberg; T Jacks
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  The retinoblastoma protein as a transcriptional repressor.

Authors:  K Helin; H Ed
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 20.808

View more
  84 in total

1.  Complex transcriptional regulatory mechanisms control expression of the E2F3 locus.

Authors:  M R Adams; R Sears; F Nuckolls; G Leone; J R Nevins
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Selective induction of E2F1 in response to DNA damage, mediated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  W C Lin; F T Lin; J R Nevins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Role for E2F in control of both DNA replication and mitotic functions as revealed from DNA microarray analysis.

Authors:  S Ishida; E Huang; H Zuzan; R Spang; G Leone; M West; J R Nevins
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 4.  Integration of the pRB and p53 cell cycle control pathways.

Authors:  C L Stewart; A M Soria; P A Hamel
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  The role of E2F4 in adipogenesis is independent of its cell cycle regulatory activity.

Authors:  Rebecca L Landsberg; Julia E Sero; Paul S Danielian; Tina L Yuan; Eunice Y Lee; Jacqueline A Lees
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Inactivation of E2F3 results in centrosome amplification.

Authors:  Harold I Saavedra; Baidehi Maiti; Cynthia Timmers; Rachel Altura; Yukari Tokuyama; Kenji Fukasawa; Gustavo Leone
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 31.743

7.  E2f1-3 are critical for myeloid development.

Authors:  Prashant Trikha; Nidhi Sharma; Rene Opavsky; Andres Reyes; Clarissa Pena; Michael C Ostrowski; Martine F Roussel; Gustavo Leone
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-11-28       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Two Distinct E2F Transcriptional Modules Drive Cell Cycles and Differentiation.

Authors:  Maria C Cuitiño; Thierry Pécot; Daokun Sun; Raleigh Kladney; Takayuki Okano-Uchida; Neelam Shinde; Resham Saeed; Antonio J Perez-Castro; Amy Webb; Tom Liu; Soo In Bae; Linda Clijsters; Nicholas Selner; Vincenzo Coppola; Cynthia Timmers; Michael C Ostrowski; Michele Pagano; Gustavo Leone
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 9.423

9.  Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors.

Authors:  Mona L Gauthier; Hal K Berman; Caroline Miller; Krystyna Kozakeiwicz; Karen Chew; Dan Moore; Joseph Rabban; Yunn Yi Chen; Karla Kerlikowske; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Transcription Factor E2F3a in Nucleus Accumbens Affects Cocaine Action via Transcription and Alternative Splicing.

Authors:  Hannah M Cates; Elizabeth A Heller; Casey K Lardner; Immanuel Purushothaman; Catherine J Peña; Deena M Walker; Michael E Cahill; Rachael L Neve; Li Shen; Rosemary C Bagot; Eric J Nestler
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.