Literature DB >> 10778895

Montgomery Thyroplasty Implant for vocal fold immobility: phonatory outcomes.

A McLean-Muse1, W W Montgomery, R E Hillman, M Varvares, G Bunting, P Doyle, J Eng.   

Abstract

Forty-three patients with a diagnosis of unilateral vocal fold immobility underwent thyroplasty type I with the Montgomery Thyroplasty Implant System. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed by means of videostroboscopic, acoustic, and aerodynamic measures. Clinicians' perceptions of vocal quality and patients' satisfaction with the surgery and vocal quality were determined. Improvements after surgery were observed for glottal closure, vocal fold amplitude, mucosal wave activity, average intensity, maximum intensity range, maximum phonation time, glottal airflow, average sound pressure, and subglottal pressure. Average postsurgical fundamental frequency values fell within normal limits and did not display significant changes relative to presurgical values. The clinicians' perceptual evaluations indicated an improvement in voice quality for most patients. A majority of patients expressed satisfaction with the surgery and resulting voice quality. The results of the present study, in combination with the surgical advantages that have been described for the Montgomery Thyroplasty Implant System, support the view that this approach offers an attractive alternative for treating unilateral vocal fold immobility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10778895     DOI: 10.1177/000348940010900410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  8 in total

1.  Neck surface electromyography as a measure of vocal hyperfunction before and after injection laryngoplasty.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; James T Heaton; Marie E Jetté; James A Burns; Robert E Hillman
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Multiparameter analysis of titanium vocal fold medializing implant in an excised larynx model.

Authors:  Rachel E Witt; Matthew R Hoffman; Gerhard Friedrich; Adam L Rieves; Benjamin J Schoepke; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  [Treatment of glottal gap].

Authors:  S Voigt-Zimmermann; C Arens
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  Voice outcome indicators for unilateral vocal fold paralysis surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  G Desuter; M Dedry; B Schaar; J van Lith-Bijl; P P van Benthem; E V Sjögren
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  "Finding a Voice": Imaging Features after Phonosurgical Procedures for Vocal Fold Paralysis.

Authors:  B A Vachha; D T Ginat; P Mallur; M Cunnane; G Moonis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Estimation of Subglottal Pressure From Neck Surface Vibration in Patients With Voice Disorders.

Authors:  Katherine L Marks; Jonathan Z Lin; James A Burns; Tiffiny A Hron; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Surgical procedures for voice restoration.

Authors:  Tadeus Nawka; Werner Hosemann
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-09-28

8.  Pre- and intraoperative acoustic and functional assessment of the novel APrevent® VOIS implant during routine medialization thyroplasty.

Authors:  Guan-Yuh Ho; Matthias Leonhard; Doris-Maria Denk-Linnert; Berit Schneider-Stickler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.