Literature DB >> 10778811

Does type of health insurance affect health care use and assessments of care among the privately insured?

J D Reschovsky1, P Kemper, H Tu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To inform the debate about managed care by examining how different types of private insurance-indemnity insurance, PPOs, open model HMOs, and closed model HMOs-affect the use of health services and consumer assessments of care. DATA SOURCES/DATA COLLECTION: The 1996-1997 Community Tracking Study Household Survey, a nationally representative telephone survey of households, and the Community Tracking Study Insurance Followback Survey, a supplement to the Household Survey, which asks insurance organizations to match household respondents to specific insurance products. The analysis sample includes 27,257 nonelderly individuals covered by private insurance. STUDY
DESIGN: Based on insurer reports, individuals are grouped into one of the four insurance product types. Measures of service use include ambulatory visits, preventive care use, hospital use, surgeries, specialist use, and whether there is a usual source of care. Consumer assessments of care include unmet or delayed care needs, satisfaction with health care, ratings of the last physician visit, and trust in physicians. Estimates are adjusted to control for differences in individual characteristics and location. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: As one moves from indemnity insurance to PPOs to open model HMOs to closed model HMOs, use of primary care increases modestly but use of specialists is reduced. Few differences are observed in other areas of service use, such as preventive care, hospital use, and surgeries. The likelihood of having unmet or delayed care does not vary by insurance type, but the reasons that underlie such access problems do vary: enrollees in more managed products are less likely to cite financial barriers to care but are more likely to perceive problems in provider access, convenience, and organizational factors. Consumer assessments of care-including satisfaction with care, ratings of the last physician visit, and trust in physicians-are generally lower under more managed products, particularly closed model HMOs.
CONCLUSIONS: The type of insurance that people have-not just whether it is managed care but the type of managed care-affects their use of services and their assessments of the care they receive. Consumers and policymakers should be reminded that managed care encompasses a variety of types of insurance products that have different effects and may require different policy responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10778811      PMCID: PMC1089097     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  16 in total

1.  Voters and health care in the 1998 election.

Authors:  R J Blendon; J M Benson; M Brodie; D E Altman; M James; L Hugick
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-07-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Access to care in HMOs and traditional insurance plans.

Authors:  T Mark; C Mueller
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Does managed care lead to better or worse quality of care?

Authors:  R H Miller; H S Luft
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  A national survey of the arrangements managed-care plans make with physicians.

Authors:  M R Gold; R Hurley; T Lake; T Ensor; R Berenson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1995-12-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Primary care performance in fee-for-service and prepaid health care systems. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  D G Safran; A R Tarlov; W H Rogers
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1994-05-25       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Patients' ratings of outpatient visits in different practice settings. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  H R Rubin; B Gandek; W H Rogers; M Kosinski; C A McHorney; J E Ware
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  10 in total

1.  Plan characteristics and SSI enrollees' access to and quality of care in four TennCare MCOs.

Authors:  Steven C Hill; Judith Wooldridge
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Racial and ethnic disparities and perceptions of health care: does health plan type matter?

Authors:  Kelly A Hunt; Ayorkor Gaba; Risa Lavizzo-Mourey
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Vulnerability and unmet health care needs. The influence of multiple risk factors.

Authors:  Leiyu Shi; Gregory D Stevens
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Impacts of managed care patient protection laws on health services utilization and patient satisfaction with care.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; John R Rattliff; Mark A Hall
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  HMO coverage reduces variations in the use of health care among patients under age sixty-five.

Authors:  Laurence C Baker; M Kate Bundorf; Daniel P Kessler
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Understanding perception and factors influencing private voluntary health insurance policy subscription in the Lucknow region.

Authors:  Tanuj Mathur; Ujjwal Kanti Paul; Himanshu Narayan Prasad; Subodh Chandra Das
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-12-28

7.  High medical cost burdens, patient trust, and perceived quality of care.

Authors:  Peter J Cunningham
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Access disparity and health inequality of the elderly: unmet needs and delayed healthcare.

Authors:  Tetsuji Yamada; Chia-Ching Chen; Chiyoe Murata; Hiroshi Hirai; Toshiyuki Ojima; Katsunori Kondo; Joseph R Harris
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Quality of life and patient satisfaction: ESRD managed care demonstration.

Authors:  Trinh B Pifer; Jennifer L Bragg-Gresham; Dawn M Dykstra; Jennifer R Shapiro; Caitlin Carroll Oppenheimer; Daniel S Gaylin; Nancy Beronja; Robert J Rubin; Philip J Held
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2003

10.  Affordable care act: comparison of healthcare indicators among different insurance beneficiaries with new coverage eligibility.

Authors:  Young Rock Hong; Derek Holcomb; Michelyn Bhandari; Laurie Larkin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.