Literature DB >> 10776091

Venepuncture versus heel prick for the collection of the Newborn Screening Test.

P W Logan1.   

Abstract

This study compared the heel prick with venepuncture of a superficial vein on the dorsum of the hand to collect the Newborn Screening Test. Midwives at two different maternity centres collected the blood samples, with midwives at each centre using only one of the two blood collecting approaches being studied. The time taken to collect the Newborn Screening Test and four crying parameters (amount of crying, percentage of crying, length of first cry and cry latency) were measured. Thirty-six infants were assigned to either a control or experimental group and their Newborn Screening Tests were recorded on audiotape. Analysis of the results found a shorter sample collection time, length of crying, duration of the first cry, a lower percentage of crying, and increased cry latency for the venepuncture group; all significant at the P < 0.05 level. These findings suggest that venepuncture should be the preferred technique for midwives to collect the Newborn Screening Test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10776091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Adv Nurs        ISSN: 0813-0531            Impact factor:   0.647


  2 in total

1.  Venepuncture is preferable to heel lance for blood sampling in term neonates.

Authors:  S Ogawa; T Ogihara; E Fujiwara; K Ito; M Nakano; S Nakayama; T Hachiya; N Fujimoto; H Abe; S Ban; E Ikeda; H Tamai
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Heart rate variability in response to pain stimulus in VLBW infants followed longitudinally during NICU stay.

Authors:  Nikhil S Padhye; Amber L Williams; Asif Z Khattak; Robert E Lasky
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.038

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.