Literature DB >> 10774624

Is therapeutic drug monitoring a case for optimizing clinical outcome and avoiding interactions of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?

B B Rasmussen1, K Brøsen.   

Abstract

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) comprise citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline and they differ from each other in chemical structure, by pharmacokinetic properties and, most importantly, with respect to enzyme-specific metabolism and interactions. Citalopram is administered as a racemic mixture. The drug is oxidated to desmethylcitalopram in the liver, partially by CYP2C19 and partially by CYP3A4. Fluoxetine is administered as a racemate of R- and S-fluoxetine. Both R- and S-fluoxetine are metabolized by CYP2D6 to the active metabolites R- and S-norfluoxetine. Fluvoxamine is metabolized to inactive metabolites by CYP1A2 and CYP2D6. Paroxetine is metabolized to inactive metabolites partially by CYP2D6, and accordingly the metabolism of paroxetine is dependent on the genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6. Sertraline is metabolized to desmethylsertraline, probably by CYP3A4. Several analytical methods have been described for all SSRIs. Most assays are based on separation by high-performance liquid chromatography or gas chromatography. Stereoselective methods for the analysis of racemic citalopram and fluoxetine have been published. The SSRIs are generally well tolerated and their therapeutic indices are large. In several studies there has not been found a clear relationship between clinical efficacy and plasma concentration, nor any threshold that defines toxic concentrations. The available data do not suggest that any benefit be obtained from routine monitoring of SSRI plasma levels. Therefore therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the SSRIs may be useful mainly in situations where poor compliance is suspected and when therapeutic failure or toxic events are experienced at clinically relevant dosages. Further, in special populations, such as in elderly patients, poor metabolizers of sparteine (CYP2D6) or mephenytoin (CYP2C19), and patients with liver impairment, the measurement of plasma concentrations may be useful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10774624     DOI: 10.1097/00007691-200004000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Drug Monit        ISSN: 0163-4356            Impact factor:   3.681


  16 in total

Review 1.  Role of pharmacogenomics in individualising treatment with SSRIs.

Authors:  Dalu Mancama; Robert W Kerwin
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

2.  Omeprazole preferentially inhibits the metabolism of (+)-(S)-citalopram in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Adriana Rocha; Eduardo B Coelho; Stefânia A Sampaio; Vera L Lanchote
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic tests as tools in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Eveline Jaquenoud Sirot; Jan Willem van der Velden; Katharina Rentsch; Chin B Eap; Pierre Baumann
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Influence of chronic administration of antidepressant drugs on mRNA for galanin, galanin receptors, and tyrosine hydroxylase in catecholaminergic and serotonergic cell-body regions in rat brain.

Authors:  Molly L Rovin; Katherine A Boss-Williams; Reid S Alisch; James C Ritchie; David Weinshenker; Charles H K West; Jay M Weiss
Journal:  Neuropeptides       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.286

5.  Influence of the CYP2D6*4 polymorphism on dose, switching and discontinuation of antidepressants.

Authors:  Monique J Bijl; Loes E Visser; Albert Hofman; Arnold G Vulto; Teun van Gelder; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Ron H N van Schaik
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  "There is no dose-response relationship in psychopharmacotherapy" vs "pharmacotherapy in psychiatry is based on ligand-receptor interaction": a unifying hypothesis and the need for plasma concentration based clinical trials.

Authors:  Vincent Eggart; Christoph Hiemke; Gerald Zernig
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Adherence of antidepressants during pregnancy: MEMS compared with three other methods.

Authors:  Judith Bosman; Peter G J Ter Horst; Jan Pieter Smit; Jeroen R Dijkstra; Hans R Beekhuis; Robbert J Slingersland; Wobbe Hospes
Journal:  Ther Adv Psychopharmacol       Date:  2014-04

8.  Implication of 5-HT2 receptor subtypes in the mechanism of action of antidepressants in the four plates test.

Authors:  Bríd Aine Nic Dhonnchadha; Nadège Ripoll; Florence Clénet; Martine Hascoët; Michel Bourin
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Antidepressant drugs with differing pharmacological actions decrease activity of locus coeruleus neurons.

Authors:  Charles H K West; James C Ritchie; Katherine A Boss-Williams; Jay M Weiss
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  Chronic citalopram administration causes a sustained suppression of serotonin synthesis in the mouse forebrain.

Authors:  Gerard Honig; Minke E Jongsma; Marieke C G van der Hart; Laurence H Tecott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.