OBJECTIVES: The biologic phenotype of HIV-1 primary isolates obtained from approximately 50% of patients who progress to AIDS switches from non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) to syncytium-inducing (SI). We evaluated possible associations between virus coreceptor usage, sensitivity to inhibition by beta-chemokines, and disease progression of patients who continue to yield NSI isolates after developing AIDS. STUDY DESIGN/ METHODS: Sequential virus isolates were analyzed for biologic phenotype using the MT-2 cell assay, for sensitivity to beta-chemokines using RANTES inhibition, and for coreceptor usage using U87.CD4 and GHOST.CD4 cells expressing different chemokine/orphan receptors or donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) defective in CCR5 expression. In addition, the env V3 region was sequenced and the length of the V2 region determined. RESULTS: All NSI isolates, regardless of patient status at time of isolation, were dependent on CCR5 expression for cell entry. Furthermore, there was no indication of broadened coreceptor usage of NSI isolates obtained from persons with late-stage AIDS. A majority of NSI isolates remained RANTES sensitive; however, virus variants with reduced sensitivity were observed. The V2 lengths and the V3 sequences exhibited no or minor changes at analysis of sequential NSI isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that NSI isolates obtained from AIDS patients remain CCR5 dependent (ie, R5) and, in many cases, also remain sensitive to RANTES inhibition. However, virus variants with decreased sensitivity to RANTES inhibition may evolve during disease progression, not only as a result of a switch from NSI to SI but also in patients who develop AIDS while continuing to maintain R5 isolates.
OBJECTIVES: The biologic phenotype of HIV-1 primary isolates obtained from approximately 50% of patients who progress to AIDS switches from non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) to syncytium-inducing (SI). We evaluated possible associations between virus coreceptor usage, sensitivity to inhibition by beta-chemokines, and disease progression of patients who continue to yield NSI isolates after developing AIDS. STUDY DESIGN/ METHODS: Sequential virus isolates were analyzed for biologic phenotype using the MT-2 cell assay, for sensitivity to beta-chemokines using RANTES inhibition, and for coreceptor usage using U87.CD4 and GHOST.CD4 cells expressing different chemokine/orphan receptors or donor peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) defective in CCR5 expression. In addition, the env V3 region was sequenced and the length of the V2 region determined. RESULTS: All NSI isolates, regardless of patient status at time of isolation, were dependent on CCR5 expression for cell entry. Furthermore, there was no indication of broadened coreceptor usage of NSI isolates obtained from persons with late-stage AIDS. A majority of NSI isolates remained RANTES sensitive; however, virus variants with reduced sensitivity were observed. The V2 lengths and the V3 sequences exhibited no or minor changes at analysis of sequential NSI isolates. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that NSI isolates obtained from AIDSpatients remain CCR5 dependent (ie, R5) and, in many cases, also remain sensitive to RANTES inhibition. However, virus variants with decreased sensitivity to RANTES inhibition may evolve during disease progression, not only as a result of a switch from NSI to SI but also in patients who develop AIDS while continuing to maintain R5 isolates.
Authors: Jasminka Sterjovski; Michael Roche; Melissa J Churchill; Anne Ellett; William Farrugia; Lachlan R Gray; Daniel Cowley; Pantelis Poumbourios; Benhur Lee; Steven L Wesselingh; Anthony L Cunningham; Paul A Ramsland; Paul R Gorry Journal: Virology Date: 2010-06-08 Impact factor: 3.616
Authors: Maria José Duenas-Decamp; Paul J Peters; Alexander Repik; Thomas Musich; Maria Paz Gonzalez-Perez; Catherine Caron; Richard Brown; Jonathan Ball; Paul R Clapham Journal: Future Virol Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 1.831
Authors: Ulf Karlsson; Liselotte Antonsson; Johanna Repits; Patrik Medstrand; Christer Owman; Karin Kidd-Ljunggren; Lars Hagberg; Bo Svennerholm; Marianne Jansson; Magnus Gisslén; Bengt Ljungberg Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Victoria R Polonis; Mark S de Souza; Janice M Darden; Somsak Chantakulkij; Thippawan Chuenchitra; Sorachai Nitayaphan; Arthur E Brown; Merlin L Robb; Deborah L Birx Journal: J Virol Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Ingrid Karlsson; Liselotte Antonsson; Yu Shi; Monica Oberg; Anders Karlsson; Jan Albert; Björn Olde; Christer Owman; Marianne Jansson; Eva Maria Fenyö Journal: J Virol Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Thomas J Ketas; Shawn E Kuhmann; Ashley Palmer; Juan Zurita; Weijing He; Sunil K Ahuja; Per Johan Klasse; John P Moore Journal: Virology Date: 2007-04-10 Impact factor: 3.616