Literature DB >> 10771498

Prevalence of low-back pain in Lesotho mothers.

Z Worku1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify factors that strongly affect the presence of severe low-back pain in mothers living in the Maseru District of Lesotho, to find out whether there is any truth to the widespread belief that rural mothers are more vulnerable to severe low-back pain than their urban counteTparts, and to identify influential factors that are strongly associated with each other.
METHODS: A random sample of 4001 mothers was collected from the Maseru District of Lesotho in September 1994 by using sampling techniques of stratification and proportional allocation with respect to size. The following 10 explanatory variables of study were used: intensive farm work, gravidity (number of births plus abortions), residential area, heavy weight lifting, the literacy status of the mother, strenuous manual labor, the availability of basic health services, the income status of the mother, cooking method at home, and breast-feeding. The dependent variable of study was the presence or absence of severe low-back pain. Discriminant and log-linear analyses were done to analyze the data collected. Discriminant analysis was done by using the presence or absence of severe low-back pain as a classifying variable and the 10 explanatory variables that affect the classifying variable. Log-linear analysis was also done by using the same data with 9 of the 11 variables of study.
RESULTS: A total of 405 (10.12%) of the 4001 mothers in the study had severe low-back pain at the time of data collection, 513 (12.82%) had moderate low-back pain, and 1422 (35.54%) had mild low-back pain. A total of 319 (78.77%) of the 405 mothers with severe low-back pain were poor, illiterate, and from rural communities. Results from discriminant analysis revealed that the presence of severe low-back pain was strongly affected by intensive farm work, the residential area of the mother, and gravidity of the mother in a decreasing order of strength and led to results similar to those obtained from discriminant analysis. The study also showed that rural mothers and their children were more disadvantaged than their urban counterparts with regard to basic health services.
CONCLUSION: Recommendations were made to the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare of Lesotho to improve the provision of basic health services, including health education on the importance of chiropractors to the community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10771498     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-4754(00)90243-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  5 in total

Review 1.  The prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review.

Authors:  Quinette A Louw; Linzette D Morris; Karen Grimmer-Somers
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.362

2.  Back pain in pregnant women attending an antenatal clinic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Authors:  Carmen Hawker; Laura O'Connor; Poovendhree Reddy; Firoza Haffejee; Maureen N Sibiya; Dorinda Borg; Shanaz Ghuman; Thembilihle S P Ngxongo; Nalini Govender
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2021-07-30

3.  Burden of pain in back and extremities in rural population: A community-based estimation of 12-month prevalence, distribution and duration of pain in rural Gadchiroli, India.

Authors:  Anand A Bang; Shekhar Y Bhojraj; Mahesh Deshmukh; Vinay R Joshi; Tushar Yarmal; Sameer Kalkotwar; Abhay T Bang
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 4.413

4.  An update on the prevalence of low back pain in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Linzette Deidrè Morris; Kurt John Daniels; Bhaswati Ganguli; Quinette Abegail Louw
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Associations between the number of children, age at childbirths and prevalence of chronic low back pain: the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study.

Authors:  Ingrid Heuch; Ivar Heuch; Knut Hagen; Kjersti Storheim; John-Anker Zwart
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.