Literature DB >> 10771230

Intraocular lens movement and accommodation in eyes of young patients.

H Lesiewska-Junk1, J Kałuzny.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the position of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PC IOLs) at distance and near and the amplitude of pseudoaccommodation in young eyes.
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University School of Medical Sciences, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
METHODS: This study comprised 45 eyes of 38 patients aged 12 to 19 years who had removal of congenital cataract with implantation of a PC IOL. During the follow-up, the refractive error ranged between -1.00 and +1.00 diopter (D), and near visual acuity was 0.75 or 0.50 (Snellen) without additional correction. The position of the PC IOL was measured by A-mode ultrasound at distance and near. Pseudoaccommodation amplitude was calculated using Gullstrand's near-point rule.
RESULTS: Mean anterior movement of the IOL was 0.42 mm at near. Mean pseudoaccommodation amplitude was 4.50 D. The correlation between these values was significant (P <.01).
CONCLUSION: The movement of PC IOLs in young patients may be one reason they attain good near vision without additional correction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10771230     DOI: 10.1016/s0886-3350(99)00407-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  15 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  A dual optic accommodating foldable intraocular lens.

Authors:  S D McLeod; V Portney; A Ting
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Position-dependent accommodative shift of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses.

Authors:  K Schöpfer; A Berger; C Korb; B M Stoffelns; N Pfeiffer; W Sekundo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.

Authors:  R Menapace; O Findl; K Kriechbaum; Ch Leydolt-Koeppl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Optical principles, biomechanics, and initial clinical performance of a dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Stephen D McLeod
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2006

6.  Evaluation of the performance of accommodating IOLs using a paraxial optics analysis.

Authors:  Jit Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens.

Authors:  Hanka Schneider; Oliver Stachs; Katja Göbel; Rudolf Guthoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Evaluation of the iridocorneal angle with accommodation using optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Daniel Monsálvez-Romín; Antonio Del Águila-Carrasco; Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; José J Esteve-Taboada; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Pseudo-accommodation in non-amblyopic children after bilateral cataract surgery and implantation with a monofocal intraocular lens: prevalence and possible mechanisms.

Authors:  Charlotte Dénier; Pascal Dureau; Catherine Edelson; Amandine Barjol; Georges Caputo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  [Measurement of accommodation using optical biometry].

Authors:  A Nurispahic; K Kotliar; I Lanzl
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.