Literature DB >> 10770974

Standard peritoneal permeability analysis in children.

Antonia H M Bouts1, Jean-Claude Davin1, Jaap W Groothoff1, Sjoerd Ploos VAN Amstel1, Machteld M Zweers2, Raymond T Krediet2.   

Abstract

Peritoneal transport characteristics in children on peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been reported to be different compared to adults. However, various test methods can influence this difference. Thirty-one standard peritoneal permeability analyses (SPA) were performed in 18 PD children with a median (range) age of 9.8 yr (2 to 19) and a median duration of PD of 2.6 yr (0.19 to 6.8). The median mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC) for creatinine was 9.6 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (4.4 to 18.0), and for urea 17.3 ml/min per 1. 73 m(2) (12.2 to 22.8). The median dialysate to plasma creatinine ratio (D/P(Cr)) was 0.69 (0.44 to 0.92), the glucose absorption 59% (23 to 75), and the D/D(0) for glucose 0.38 (0.23 to 0.62). The median clearance of beta(2)-microglobulin was 923 microl/min per 1. 73 m(2) (366 to 1828), of albumin 103 microl/min per 1.73 m(2) (55 to 211), of IgG 48 microl/min per 1.73 m(2) (20 to 105), and of alpha(2)-macroglobulin 12 microl/min per 1.73 m(2) (5 to 49). No correlation was found between these results and age or PD time. The restriction coefficient for macromolecules indeed increased with duration of PD treatment (r = 0.38, P = 0.03). The median transcapillary ultrafiltration rate was 1.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (-0. 01 to 2.8), the net ultrafiltration rate 0.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (-1.97 to 1.82), and the effective lymphatic absorption rate 1.04 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (-0.06 to 2.91). When corrected for body surface area, no differences were found in peritoneal fluid and solute transport characteristics between children and adults. No effect of time on PD on the transport parameters was found in a cross-sectional analysis, except for an increase of the restriction coefficient to macromolecules. This finding is similar to observations in adults. Therefore, the present study showed no evidence for the common belief that the peritoneal membrane in children is different from that in adult patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10770974     DOI: 10.1681/ASN.V115943

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  6 in total

Review 1.  Peritoneal dialysis prescription in children: bedside principles for optimal practice.

Authors:  Michel Fischbach; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 2.  Peritoneal dialysis in children with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Franz Schaefer; Bradley A Warady
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 3.  Can peritoneal dialysis be used as a long term therapy for end stage renal disease?

Authors:  Michele Giannattasio; Michele Buemi; Flavia Caputo; Giusto Viglino; Enrico Verrina
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Histomorphological and functional changes of the peritoneal membrane during long-term peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Andreas Fusshoeller
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 5.  Selection of modalities, prescription, and technical issues in children on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Enrico Verrina; Valeria Cappelli; Francesco Perfumo
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.714

6.  Quantitative Histomorphometry of the Healthy Peritoneum.

Authors:  Betti Schaefer; Maria Bartosova; Stephan Macher-Goeppinger; Akos Ujszaszi; Markus Wallwiener; Joanne Nyarangi-Dix; Peter Sallay; Dorothea Burkhardt; Uwe Querfeld; Viktoria Pfeifle; Bernd Lahrmann; Vedat Schwenger; Elke Wühl; Stefan Holland-Cunz; Franz Schaefer; Claus P Schmitt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.