Literature DB >> 10770521

Diagnostic value of electrophysiological tests in patients with sciatica.

M J Albeck1, G Taher, M Lauritzen, W Trojaborg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the diagnostic value of electrophysiological tests in patients with sciatica.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The diagnostic value of electrophysiological tests were evaluated in 25 patients with monoradicular sciatica. The electrophysiological study included dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials, electromyography, F-wave latencies, H-reflexes and motor and sensory nerve conduction determinations. The results of the electrophysiological examinations were evaluated blindly, and the test results were analysed separately by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Furthermore, the 5 modalities were evaluated jointly and analysed by a decision-analytic regret function.
RESULTS: A high predictive value was found for the H-reflex examination, but low for the other modalities. When the 5 modalities were evaluated jointly, a non-significant decrease in expected regret from the pre-test situation of 0.96 to a value of 0.93 in post-test situation was revealed.
CONCLUSION: Electrophysiological testing is not sufficient as stand-alone examination in patients with sciatica.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10770521     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0404.2000.101004249.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6314            Impact factor:   3.209


  10 in total

1.  Critically re-evaluating a common technique: Accuracy, reliability, and confirmation bias of EMG.

Authors:  Pushpa Narayanaswami; Thomas Geisbush; Lyell Jones; Michael Weiss; Tahseen Mozaffar; Gary Gronseth; Seward B Rutkove
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 9.910

2.  Diagnostic use of dermatomal somatosensory-evoked potentials in spinal disorders: Case series.

Authors:  Pinar Yalinay Dikmen; A Emre Oge
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Diagnostic value of history, physical examination and needle electromyography in diagnosing lumbosacral radiculopathy.

Authors:  Suzan Coster; Sebastiaan F T M de Bruijn; Dénes L J Tavy
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-09-11       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Acute Sciatic Neuritis following Lumbar Laminectomy.

Authors:  Foad Elahi; Patrick Hitchon; Chandan G Reddy
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2014-06-15

Review 5.  Clinical uses of H reflexes of upper and lower limb muscles.

Authors:  David Burke
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol Pract       Date:  2016-04-07

6.  Steroids and L-Lysine Aescinate for Acute Radiculopathy Due to a Herniated Lumbar Disk.

Authors:  Mykhaylo Oros; Mykhailo Oros Jar; Vasyl Grabar
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 7.  Far lateral lumbar disc herniation part 1: Imaging, neurophysiology and clinical features.

Authors:  Luigi Valentino Berra; Andrea Di Rita; Federico Longhitano; Enrico Mailland; Paolo Reganati; Alessandro Frati; Antonio Santoro
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2021-12-18

8.  Diagnostic Implication and Clinical Relevance of Dermatomal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials in Patients with Radiculopathy: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Nam-Gyu Jo; Myoung-Hwan Ko; Yu Hui Won; Sung-Hee Park; Gi-Wook Kim; Jeong-Hwan Seo
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Electrophysiologic Tests in Clinical Diagnosis of Lower Extremity Radicular Pain.

Authors:  E G Hasankhani; F Omidi-Kashani
Journal:  ISRN Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-15

10.  Correlation between Findings in Physical Examination, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Nerve Conduction Studies in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy Caused by Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation.

Authors:  Safa Yousif; Afraa Musa; Ammar Ahmed; Ahmed Abdelhai
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2020-01-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.