Literature DB >> 10769220

Comb-wax discrimination by honeybees tested with the proboscis extension reflex.

B Fröhlich1, M Riederer, J Tautz.   

Abstract

We used the proboscis extension reflex of honeybees to test their ability to discriminate between comb waxes of different ages (wax scales, 1-week-old wax, 2- to 3-year-old wax, 8- to 10-year-old wax). Such waxes differ in their chemical composition, and an ability to discriminate between them may aid the orientation of the bees in the nest. To train the bees, we used whole extracts of waxes and four different fractions of the whole extract based on different elutions of solid-phase extractions (extract I, fraction A eluted with hexane and fraction B with diethylether; extract II, fraction B further subdivided into fraction C by elution with isopropylchloride and fraction D by elution with diethylether). In a differential training regime (six learning and six test trials) with whole extracts or with the different fractions, we paired one type of wax with a reward and another with no reward. The bees learned to discriminate between all tested pairs of whole extracts. The two subfractions (fractions A and B) gave different results: the bees could discriminate between waxes of different ages when fraction B was used but not when fraction A was used. A further subdivision of fraction B into fractions C and D showed that only fraction D contained the elements that enabled bees to discriminate between old and new wax. Fraction D makes up only 5?8 % of the total wax mass and contains hydroxy alkyl esters (5?6 % of the total wax mass), primary alcohols (0.3?0.5 % of the total wax mass) and acids (0.06?1. 0 % of the total wax mass). Fractions A and C (together forming 62?64 % of the total wax mass), which consist of unbranched and branched aliphatic hydrocarbons and alkyl esters, could not be discriminated by the bees. The remaining wax mass (25?29 %) was eluted with a mixture of chloroform, methanol and water (13:5:1) as fraction E.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10769220     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.10.1581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Thermal Behaviour of Honeybees During Aggressive Interactions.

Authors:  Anton Stabentheiner; Helmut Kovac; Sigurd Schmaranzer
Journal:  Ethology       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 1.897

2.  Chemical profiles of body surfaces and nests from six Bornean stingless bee species.

Authors:  Sara Diana Leonhardt; Nico Blüthgen; Thomas Schmitt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  Wax perception in honeybees: contact is not necessary.

Authors:  Axel Brockmann; Claudia Groh; Birgit Fröhlich
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2003-08-02

Review 4.  The proboscis extension reflex to evaluate learning and memory in honeybees (Apis mellifera): some caveats.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Frost; Dave Shutler; Neil Kirk Hillier
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2012-08-07

5.  Interspecific utilisation of wax in comb building by honeybees.

Authors:  H Randall Hepburn; Sarah E Radloff; Orawan Duangphakdee; Mananya Phaincharoen
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2009-03-04

6.  Is the Salivary Gland Associated with Honey Bee Recognition Compounds in Worker Honey Bees (Apis mellifera)?

Authors:  Stephen J Martin; Maria E Correia-Oliveira; Sue Shemilt; Falko P Drijfhout
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.626

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.