Literature DB >> 10768802

Seattle 5-a-Day Work-Site Project: process evaluation.

S A Beresford1, J Shannon, D McLerran, B Thompson.   

Abstract

The Seattle 5-a-Day Work-Site Project developed a community-based intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intake, using both environmental (including cafeteria and work-site-wide events) and individual strategies. The Employee Advisory Board developed its own protocol from a common skeleton and a minimum set of activities. Small work sites and work sites with fewer female employees delivered more displays, posters, and table tents per employee (p < .01 and p < .05, respectively). Dose was neither related to use of the intervention nor to change in fruit and vegetable intake. Use of informational materials increased fruit and vegetable intake in the cohort of employees with both baseline and follow-up data (p = .05). The intervention was associated both with increased employee use of the intervention (activities and materials) and with increased intake of fruit and vegetables. Work sites with medium average baseline intake were the most responsive. These findings can guide the development of more efficient community-based dietary interventions.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768802     DOI: 10.1177/109019810002700207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Behav        ISSN: 1090-1981


  9 in total

1.  Promoting healthy behaviors to prevent chronic disease in Panama and Trinidad & Tobago: results of the women as agents of change project.

Authors:  Sarah C White; Irene Agurto; Nuria Araguas
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-10

2.  Differences in response to a dietary intervention between the general population and first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Donna McClish; Patrica Carcaise-Edinboro; Hali Esinhart; Diane Baer Wilson; Melanie K Bean
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  ACTION live: using process evaluation to describe implementation of a worksite wellness program.

Authors:  Carolyn C Johnson; Yen-Ling Lai; Janet Rice; Diego Rose; Larry S Webber
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.162

4.  Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity and obesity.

Authors:  Luke Wolfenden; Sharni Goldman; Fiona G Stacey; Alice Grady; Melanie Kingsland; Christopher M Williams; John Wiggers; Andrew Milat; Chris Rissel; Adrian Bauman; Margaret M Farrell; France Légaré; Ali Ben Charif; Hervé Tchala Vignon Zomahoun; Rebecca K Hodder; Jannah Jones; Debbie Booth; Benjamin Parmenter; Tim Regan; Sze Lin Yoong
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-14

Review 5.  Workplace cafeteria and other multicomponent interventions to promote healthy eating among adults: A systematic review.

Authors:  Ashika Naicker; Archana Shrestha; Chandni Joshi; Walter Willett; Donna Spiegelman
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2021-02-23

6.  Process evaluation of the Los Angeles Unified School District Nutrition Network.

Authors:  Richard E Kratz; Ninez A Ponce; Antronette K Yancey
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 2.830

Review 7.  What is actually measured in process evaluations for worksite health promotion programs: a systematic review.

Authors:  Debbie Wierenga; Luuk H Engbers; Pepijn Van Empelen; Saskia Duijts; Vincent H Hildebrandt; Willem Van Mechelen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  The effectiveness of workplace dietary interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sarah A Smith; Amelia A Lake; Carolyn Summerbell; Vera Araujo-Soares; Frances Hillier-Brown
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-03

9.  Exploring the dynamics of a free fruit at work intervention.

Authors:  Amelia A Lake; Sarah A Smith; Charlotte E Bryant; Sevil Alinia; Kirsten Brandt; Chris J Seal; Inge Tetens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.