Literature DB >> 10768587

Fecal incontinence in hospitalized patients who are acutely ill.

D Z Bliss1, S Johnson, K Savik, C R Clabots, D N Gerding.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Information about fecal incontinence experienced by patients in acute-care settings is lacking. The relationship of fecal incontinence to several well-known nosocomial or iatrogenic causes of diarrhea has not been determined.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the cumulative incidence of fecal incontinence in hospitalized patients who are acutely ill, and to ascertain the relationship between fecal incontinence and stool consistency, and between diarrhea and two well-known nosocomial or iatrogenic etiologies of diarrhea: Clostridium difficile and tube feeding. The relationship of fecal incontinence and risk factors for diarrhea associated with C. difficile and tube feeding in hospitalized patients was examined.
METHODS: Fecal incontinence, stool frequency and consistency, administration of tube feeding and medications, severity of illness, and nutritional data were prospectively recorded in 152 patients on acute or critical care units of a university-affiliated Veterans' Affairs Medical Center. Rectal swabs and stool specimens from patients were obtained weekly for C. difficile culture. C. difficile culture and cytotoxin assay were performed on diarrheal stools. HindIII restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) was used for typing of C. difficile isolates.
RESULTS: In this study, 33% (50/152) of the patients had fecal incontinence. The proportion of total surveillance days with fecal incontinence in these patients was 0.50 +/- 0.06. A greater percentage of patients with diarrhea had fecal incontinence than patients without diarrhea (23/53 [43%] vs. 27/99 [27%]; p = 0.04). Incontinence was more frequent in patients with loose/liquid stool consistency than in patients with hard/soft stool consistency (48/50 [96%] vs. 71/100 [71%]; p < 0.001). The proportion of surveillance days with fecal incontinence was related to the proportion of surveillance days with diarrhea (r = 0.69; p < 0.001) and the proportion of surveillance days with loose/liquid stools (r = 0.64; p < 0.001). Multivariate risk factors for fecal incontinence were unformed/loose or liquid consistency of stool (RR = 11.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2, 56.7), severity of illness (RR = 5.7; CI = 2.6, 12.3), and age (RR = 1.1; CI = 1, 1.1).
CONCLUSIONS: Fecal incontinence is common in hospitalized patients who are acutely ill, but the condition was not associated with any specific cause of diarrhea. Because loose or liquid stool consistency is a risk factor for fecal incontinence, use of treatments that result in a more formed stool may be beneficial in managing fecal incontinence. However, treatments that slow intestinal transit should be avoided in patients with C. difficile-associated diarrhea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768587     DOI: 10.1097/00006199-200003000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Res        ISSN: 0029-6562            Impact factor:   2.381


  10 in total

1.  Complete circumferential rectal ulceration and haemorrhage secondary to the use of a faecal management system.

Authors:  Hudhaifah Shaker; Edward J Maile; Karen J Telford
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.409

2.  Prevalence, clinical consequences and management of acute faecal incontinence with diarrhoea in the ICU: The FIRST™ Observational Study.

Authors:  Rachel Binks; Enrico De Luca; Christine Dierkes; Andrea Franci; Eva Herrero; Georg Niederalt
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2015-06-30

3.  Incontinence-associated dermatitis: a cross-sectional prevalence study in the Australian acute care hospital setting.

Authors:  Jill L Campbell; Fiona M Coyer; Sonya R Osborne
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Prospective study on Incontinence-Associated Dermatitis and its Severity instrument for verifying its ability to predict the development of pressure ulcers in patients with fecal incontinence.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Park; Heejung Choi
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Fecal incontinence: prevalence, severity, and quality of life data from an outpatient gastroenterology practice.

Authors:  Eva H Alsheik; Thomas Coyne; Sara K Hawes; Laleh Merikhi; Scott P Naples; Nandhakumar Kanagarajan; James C Reynolds; Scott E Myers; Asyia S Ahmad
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.260

6.  Tensile properties of the rectal and sigmoid colon: a comparative analysis of human and porcine tissue.

Authors:  Michael B Christensen; Kevin Oberg; Jeffrey C Wolchok
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2015-03-26

7.  Factors contributing to fecal incontinence in older people and outcome of routine management in home, hospital and nursing home settings.

Authors:  Asangaedem Akpan; Margot A Gosney; James Barret
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

Review 8.  Fecal Incontinence in the Elderly.

Authors:  Trisha Pasricha; Kyle Staller
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.076

9.  The Traumatic Tube: Bleeding Rectal Ulcer Caused by Flexi-Seal Device.

Authors:  Abhinav Tiwari; Himani Sharma; Khola Qamar; Yaseen Alastal; Thomas Sodeman; Ali Nawras
Journal:  Case Rep Gastrointest Med       Date:  2017-10-04

10.  Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital.

Authors:  Marie Condon; Edel Mannion; D William Molloy; Rónán O'Caoimh
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.