OBJECTIVE: To assess the measurement properties of measures used to evaluate fitness and health status in the spinal cord injury (SCI) population. DESIGN: Inception cohort assessed during standardized exercise protocols at admission, discharge, and 8-week follow-up from a SCI rehabilitation program. SETTING: Urban tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred two patients with SCI. RESULTS: Measures at higher levels of physical exertion generally showed higher stability between test and retest. Resting measures, blood lactates, and respiratory exchange ratios were not stable. Heart rate, blood pressure, lactate levels, ventilation rates, and activities of daily living measures did not reflect the construct of aerobic fitness. The use of ratings of perceived exertion to predict heart rate was found to be inaccurate in the SCI population. CONCLUSION: Power output and VO2 at maximal workload, and ratings of perceived exertion at a standard workload demonstrated stability and sensitivity to therapeutic change, indicating acceptable measurement properties for the assessment of aerobic fitness in SCI patients. Some other commonly used measures can be used with less confidence.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the measurement properties of measures used to evaluate fitness and health status in the spinal cord injury (SCI) population. DESIGN: Inception cohort assessed during standardized exercise protocols at admission, discharge, and 8-week follow-up from a SCI rehabilitation program. SETTING: Urban tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred two patients with SCI. RESULTS: Measures at higher levels of physical exertion generally showed higher stability between test and retest. Resting measures, blood lactates, and respiratory exchange ratios were not stable. Heart rate, blood pressure, lactate levels, ventilation rates, and activities of daily living measures did not reflect the construct of aerobic fitness. The use of ratings of perceived exertion to predict heart rate was found to be inaccurate in the SCI population. CONCLUSION: Power output and VO2 at maximal workload, and ratings of perceived exertion at a standard workload demonstrated stability and sensitivity to therapeutic change, indicating acceptable measurement properties for the assessment of aerobic fitness in SCI patients. Some other commonly used measures can be used with less confidence.
Authors: Dominik Zbogar; Janice J Eng; Jeremy W Noble; William C Miller; Andrei V Krassioukov; Mary C Verrier Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: J Yanci; C Granados; M Otero; A Badiola; J Olasagasti; I Bidaurrazaga-Letona; A Iturricastillo; Sm Gil Journal: Biol Sport Date: 2014-11-03 Impact factor: 2.806
Authors: Jennifer J Sherwood; Cathy Inouye; Shannon L Webb; Ange Zhou; Erik A Anderson; Nicole S Spink Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Ingrid Kouwijzer; Linda J M Valent; Marcel W M Post; Lise M Wilders; Anneke Grootoonk; Lucas H V van der Woude; Sonja de Groot Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 3.412