Literature DB >> 10768439

Waiting for coronary angiography: is there a clinically ordered queue?

H Hemingway, A M Crook, G Feder, J R Dawson, A Timmis.   

Abstract

Among over 3000 patients undergoing coronary angiography in the absence of a formal queue-management system, we found that a-priori urgency scores were strongly associated with waiting times, prevalence of coronary-artery disease, rate of revascularisation, and mortality. These data challenge the widely held assumption that such waiting lists are not clinically ordered; however, the wide variation in waiting times within urgency categories suggests the need for further improvements in clinical queueing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768439     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)90018-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  3 in total

1.  Hypothetical ratings of coronary angiography appropriateness: are they associated with actual angiographic findings, mortality, and revascularisation rate? The ACRE study.

Authors:  H Hemingway; A M Crook; S Banerjee; J R Dawson; G Feder; P G Magee; A Wood; S Philpott; A Timmis
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  NHS waiting lists and evidence of national or local failure: analysis of health service data.

Authors:  Richard M Martin; Jonathan A C Sterne; David Gunnell; Shah Ebrahim; George Davey Smith; Stephen Frankel
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-01-25

3.  Assessing the cost effectiveness of using prognostic biomarkers with decision models: case study in prioritising patients waiting for coronary artery surgery.

Authors:  Martin Henriksson; Stephen Palmer; Ruoling Chen; Jacqueline Damant; Natalie K Fitzpatrick; Keith Abrams; Aroon D Hingorani; Ulf Stenestrand; Magnus Janzon; Gene Feder; Bruce Keogh; Martin J Shipley; Juan-Carlos Kaski; Adam Timmis; Mark Sculpher; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-01-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.