Literature DB >> 10768394

Mechanical power in running: a comparison of different approaches.

A Arampatzis1, A Knicker, V Metzler, G P Brüggemann.   

Abstract

The purposes of the present study were: (1) to compare four different methods of calculating mechanical power in running on the basis of comparable data over a wide range of running velocity; (2) to examine the linearity of the relation between mechanical power as calculated with the four methods and running velocity. Eight runners participated in the investigation (height: 1.82 +/- 0.03 m, body mass: 81.05 +/- 4.69 kg). A Kistler force platform registered all components of the ground reaction force (1000 Hz) during one foot ground contact, which was additionally video taped using two high-speed video cameras running at 120 Hz. Four different methods were used to calculate mechanical power. Two methods determined the mechanical power due to the work done on the athletes' center of mass and two were calculated from the motion of the athletes' segments. The four different methods provided different relations between mechanical power and running velocity. The calculations on the basis of kinematic data cannot be recommended to determine efficiency of movement. The methods based on ground reaction force measurements revealed significant linear relations (r = 0.90, r2 = 0.84) between running velocity and mechanical power.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768394     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(99)00187-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  10 in total

1.  A collisional perspective on quadrupedal gait dynamics.

Authors:  David V Lee; John E A Bertram; Jennifer T Anttonen; Ivo G Ros; Sarah L Harris; Andrew A Biewener
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  No apparent ecological trend to the flight-initiating jump performance of five bat species.

Authors:  James D Gardiner; Robert L Nudds
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Human ankle plantar flexor muscle-tendon mechanics and energetics during maximum acceleration sprinting.

Authors:  Adrian Lai; Anthony G Schache; Nicholas A T Brown; Marcus G Pandy
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Factors affecting the energy cost of level running at submaximal speed.

Authors:  Jean-René Lacour; Muriel Bourdin
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  Biomechanics of the Upper Limbs: A Review in the Sports Combat Ambit Highlighting Wearable Sensors.

Authors:  Andrés Blanco Ortega; Jhonatan Isidro Godoy; Dariusz Slawomir Szwedowicz Wasik; Eladio Martínez Rayón; Claudia Cortés García; Héctor Ramón Azcaray Rivera; Fabio Abel Gómez Becerra
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Mechanical Alterations Associated with Repeated Treadmill Sprinting under Heat Stress.

Authors:  Olivier Girard; Franck Brocherie; Jean-Benoit Morin; Sébastien Racinais; Grégoire P Millet; Julien D Périard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Foot Strike Angle Prediction and Pattern Classification Using LoadsolTM Wearable Sensors: A Comparison of Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Stephanie R Moore; Christina Kranzinger; Julian Fritz; Thomas Stӧggl; Josef Krӧll; Hermann Schwameder
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  A new method for measuring treadmill belt velocity fluctuations: effects of treadmill type, body mass and locomotion speed.

Authors:  Steffen Willwacher; Kai Daniel Oberländer; Patrick Mai; Daniela Mählich; Markus Kurz; Till Koopmann; Dominik Fohrmann; Artur Kantarev; Uwe Gustav Kersting
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Elastic energy savings and active energy cost in a simple model of running.

Authors:  Ryan T Schroeder; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Evidence for a mass dependent step-change in the scaling of efficiency in terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  Robert L Nudds; Jonathan R Codd; William I Sellers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.