Literature DB >> 10768340

Long-term incidence of reopening of macular holes.

M Paques1, P Massin, P Blain, A S Duquesnoy, A Gaudric.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence of macular hole reopening after initial successful surgery.
DESIGN: A noncomparative retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: From a series of 137 consecutive cases of idiopathic macular holes operated on between August 1993 and May 1996, the authors analyzed the charts of 116 cases of successful surgery.
SETTING: A single university-based ophthalmology department. INTERVENTION: Pars plana vitrectomy, posterior hyaloid peeling, fluid-air and air-gas exchange with a nonexpansile 17% C2F6 mixture followed by face-down positioning. Eighty-eight patients (64%) received autologous platelets as a biologic adjuvant. The anatomic success rate at the first postoperative month was 116 of 137 (85%). One hundred and six patients (91%) were followed up for more than 2 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Macular anatomic status.
RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 27 months. Eleven eyes of 11 patients (9.5%) had reopening of the macular hole. The mean period between hole surgery and reopening was 15.4 months (range, 8-29). In 8 of these 11 cases, reopening occurred after cataract extraction. In two cases, an epiretinal membrane was noted. In another case cystoid macular edema was present. The final anatomic success rate with one surgical procedure was 105 of 137 (77%). Eight reopened holes were reoperated on and all were anatomic successes at 1 month. However, four patients experienced a second reopening.
CONCLUSIONS: Macular hole reopening occurred in 9.5% of cases (11 of 116). The cause of reopening might have been any anatomic stress such as epiretinal membrane formation or macular edema. However, in most of our reopened cases, no definite cause was evident. Four patients experienced recurrent reopening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10768340     DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00182-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  24 in total

Review 1.  Vitreous surgery for macular hole-related retinal detachment after phacoemulsification cataract extraction: 10-year retrospective review.

Authors:  Q Zheng; S Yang; Y Zhang; R Wu; J Pang; W Li
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  [Macular hole. Survey and relevant surgical concepts].

Authors:  S Dithmar
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Fourth time lucky: a case of multiple recurrence of a macular hole.

Authors:  H M Hussin; R H Y Asaria; N E Knox Cartwright; R H B Grey
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  [The primary objective in macular hole surgery. Ultrastructural features of the vitreomacular interface].

Authors:  R G Schumann; M M Schaumberger; M Rohleder; C Haritoglou; A Kampik; A Gandorfer
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Heavy silicone oil tamponade after failed macular hole surgery with perfluoropropane (C3F8): a report of five cases.

Authors:  Muhammad Usman Saeed; Heinrich Heimann; David Wong; Syed Khurshid Gibran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Heavy silicone oil (Densiron-68) for the treatment of persistent macular holes: Densiron-68 endotamponade for persistent macular holes.

Authors:  Stanislao Rizzo; Federica Genovesi-Ebert; Andrea Vento; Federica Cresti; Sofia Miniaci; Maria Chiara Romagnoli
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-08-01       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Incomplete fluid-air exchange technique for idiopathic macular hole surgery.

Authors:  Bo-Jie Hu; Xue-Li Du; Wen-Bo Li; Yu-Wen Chang; Xing-Dong Shi; Teng Ma; Yong Wang; Yan-Hua He; Rui Niu; Wei-Na Cui
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  [Rate of reopening of macular holes following cataract operation].

Authors:  A Hager; S Ehrich; W Wiegand
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  Bilateral macular hole formation secondary to sclopetaria caused by shockwaves transmitted by a posterior vector: case report.

Authors:  Nancy Kunjukunju; Alicia Navarro; Scott Oliver; Jeff Olson; Chirag Patel; Gerardo Garcia; Naresh Mandava; Hugo Quiroz-Mercado
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  [Incidence and extent of postoperative macular edema following vitreoretinal surgery with and without combined cataract operation].

Authors:  S Staudt; D W Miller; K Unnebrink; F G Holz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.