Literature DB >> 10766181

The human antimouse immunoglobulin response and the anti-idiotypic network have no influence on clinical outcome in patients with minimal residual colorectal cancer treated with monoclonal antibody CO17-1A.

R Gruber1, L J van Haarlem, S O Warnaar, E Holz, G Riethmüller.   

Abstract

Murine monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), when administered to patients, induce a human antimouse immunoglobulin immune response, especially when multiple infusions are required to obtain therapeutic efficacy. In a randomized Phase II clinical study, 83 patients with colorectal carcinoma of stage Dukes C were treated with the murine IgG2a mAb 17-1A (ab1) after curative surgery. The regimen consisted of a single infusion of 500mg of 17-1A within 2 weeks after surgery, followed by 100mg of mAbs four times every 4 weeks. Sera were taken every 2-3 weeks and screened for human antimouse antibodies (HAMA). HAMA were measured by a capture ELISA and an indirect antihuman immunoglobulin ELISA for the analysis of IgG and IgM isotypes. Anti-idiotypic antibodies (ab2) were detected by an inhibition ELISA, and anti-anti-idiotypic antibodies (ab3), recognizing the original antigen, were determined by flow cytometric analysis. About 20% of patients failed to develop HAMA; in the other patients, antibody titers were initially low after the first two infusions and reached their maximum only after a fifth infusion at 18-20 weeks after surgery. An analysis that differentiated between patients who developed recurrences and those who remained tumor-free did not show any difference in antibody titers between the two groups, neither for total HAMA nor for IgG, IgM, or ab2. The formation of ab3 was analyzed in eight patients and proved to be negative in all of them. HAMA remained detectable up to 2 years after the last treatment. In patients who experienced adverse events associated with therapy, HAMA titers tended to rise earlier; this difference, however, was not statistically significant. Thus, neither a beneficial nor a detrimental effect of HAMA formation could be determined for the clinical response to antibody therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10766181

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  11 in total

Review 1.  Recombinant antibodies for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer.

Authors:  Jürgen Krauss
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Clinical radioimmunotherapy--the role of radiobiology.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Isabelle Navarro-Teulon; Manuel Bardiès; Nicolas Chouin; Guillaume Cartron; André Pèlegrin; David Azria
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Specific immunotherapy of cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  S Matzku; M Zöller
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Immune responses in advanced colorectal cancer following repeated intradermal vaccination with the anti-CEA murine monoclonal antibody, PR1A3: results of a phase I study.

Authors:  A P Zbar; H Thomas; R W Wilkinson; M Wadhwa; K N Syrigos; E L Ross; P Dilger; T G Allen-Mersh; W A Kmiot; A A Epenetos; D Snary; W F Bodmer
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-04-30       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 5.  A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detection probe technology.

Authors:  Stephen P Povoski; Ryan L Neff; Cathy M Mojzisik; David M O'Malley; George H Hinkle; Nathan C Hall; Douglas A Murrey; Michael V Knopp; Edward W Martin
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 6.  Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  K A Foon
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.945

7.  Side-by-side analysis of five clinically tested anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Markus Münz; Alexander Murr; Majk Kvesic; Doris Rau; Susanne Mangold; Stefan Pflanz; John Lumsden; Jörg Volkland; Jan Fagerberg; Gert Riethmüller; Dominik Rüttinger; Peter Kufer; Patrick A Baeuerle; Tobias Raum
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 5.722

8.  Pilot phase III immunotherapy study in early-stage breast cancer patients using oxidized mannan-MUC1 [ISRCTN71711835].

Authors:  Vasso Apostolopoulos; Geoffrey A Pietersz; Anastasios Tsibanis; Annivas Tsikkinis; Heleni Drakaki; Bruce E Loveland; Sara J Piddlesden; Magdalena Plebanski; Dodie S Pouniotis; Michael N Alexis; Ian F McKenzie; Stamatis Vassilaros
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Generation of anti-idiotype scFv for pharmacokinetic measurement in lymphoma patients treated with chimera anti-CD22 antibody SM03.

Authors:  Qi Zhao; Pui-Fan Wong; Susanna S T Lee; Shui-On Leung; Wing-Tai Cheung; Jun-Zhi Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Therapeutic applications of the selective high affinity ligand drug SH7139 extend beyond non-Hodgkin's lymphoma to many other types of solid cancers.

Authors:  Rod Balhorn; Monique Cosman Balhorn
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.