Literature DB >> 10766057

Synframe: a preliminary report.

M Aebi1, T Steffen.   

Abstract

Both endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery and the non-standardized and unstable retractor systems for the lumbar spine presently on the market have disadvantages and limitations in relation to the minimally invasive surgical concept, which have been gradually recognized in the last few years. In an attempt to resolve some of these issues, we have developed a highly versatile retractor system, which allows access to and surgery at the lumbar, thoracic and even cervical spine. This retractor system - Synframe - is based on a ring concept allowing 360 degrees access to a surgical opening in anterior as well as posterior surgery. The ring is concentrically laid over the surgical opening for the approach and is used as a carrier for retractor arms, which are instrumented with either different sizes or types of blades and/or different sizes of Hohmann hooks. In posterior surgery, nerve root retractors can also be installed. This ring also functions as a carrier for fiberoptic illumination devices and different sizes of endoscopes, used to transmit the surgical procedure out of the depth of the surgical exposure for both teaching purposes and for the surgical team when it has no longer direct visual access to the procedure. The ring is stable, being fixed onto the operating table, allowing precise minimally open approaches and surgical procedures under direct vision with optimal illumination. This ring system also opens perspectives for an integrated minimally open surgical concept, where the ring may be used as a reference platform in computer-navigated surgery.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10766057      PMCID: PMC3611433          DOI: 10.1007/pl00010021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  7 in total

1.  "Does size matter?"A comparison of balloon-assisted less-invasive vs conventional retroperitoneal approach for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Najma Farooq; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using unilateral pedicle screws and a translaminar screw.

Authors:  Anil Sethi; Sandra Lee; Rahul Vaidya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Minimal invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion (mini ALIF).

Authors:  Max Aebi; Srinivasan Parthasarathy; Ashwin Avadhani; S Rajasekaran
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Minimally invasive double approach (anterior and posterior) to the lumbar spine in revision surgery.

Authors:  Roberto Bassani; Aldo Sinigaglia; Claudio Lamartina
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Harvesting local cylinder autograft from adjacent vertebral body for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique, operative feasibility and preliminary clinical results.

Authors:  Vincent Arlet; Liang Jiang; Thomas Steffen; Jean Ouellet; Rudy Reindl; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-04-06       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Posterior lumbar spinal fusion and instrumentation in morbidly obese patients using the Synframe retractor system: technical note.

Authors:  Rahul Vaidya; Anil Sethi; Adrienne Lee; Steve Bartol; Ndidi Onwudiwe; Max Aebi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Application of small incision approach in anterior surgery of thoracic and lumbar spinal tuberculosis].

Authors:  Jiandang Shi; Jinwen He; Ningkui Niu; Zongqiang Yang; Haifeng Yuan; Huiqiang Ding
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-06-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.