Literature DB >> 10765962

Diagnostic value of a chelating agent in patients with symptoms allegedly caused by amalgam fillings.

J S Vamnes1, R Eide, R Isrenn, P J Höl, N R Gjerdet.   

Abstract

The chelating agent 2,3 dimercaptopropane-1-sulfonate (DMPS) has been used in a mercury mobilization test for diagnoses in illnesses allegedly associated with the presence of amalgam restorations. DMPS is an accepted antidote to heavy metal poisoning. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of DMPS in patients with symptoms self-related to their amalgam fillings. The subjects consisted of four groups: 19 healthy controls without amalgam experience; 21 healthy controls with amalgam fillings; 20 patients who claimed symptoms of "mercury poisoning" from dental amalgam; and 20 patients who had amalgam fillings removed because of such symptoms. DMPS (2 mg/kg body weight) was injected intravenously, and urine was collected prior to the injection, 30 and 120 min after the injection, and throughout the next 22 hrs. The samples were analyzed for total mercury by cold vapor atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The total median amounts of mercury excreted over 24 hrs for those with complaints allegedly associated with amalgam and for the healthy controls with amalgam fillings were similar. Persons with amalgam fillings excreted about three times more mercury than those without. The controls, who had never had amalgam fillings, and the subjects who had had their fillings removed excreted median amounts of 8.5 microg and 7.2 microg mercury, respectively. The present DMPS challenge test did not differentiate between patients with or those without complaints self-related to their amalgam fillings but did confirm the higher mercury values in patients with dental amalgam.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10765962     DOI: 10.1177/00220345000790031401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  7 in total

1.  American College of Medical Toxicology position statement on post-chelator challenge urinary metal testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2010-03

2.  Recommendations for provoked challenge urine testing.

Authors:  Anne-Michelle Ruha
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-12

3.  ACMT Recommends Against Use of Post-Chelator Challenge Urinary Metal Testing.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-07-19

4.  Chelation for autism spectrum disorder (ASD).

Authors:  Stephen James; Shawn W Stevenson; Natalie Silove; Katrina Williams
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-05-11

5.  Changes in health complaints after removal of amalgam fillings.

Authors:  T T Sjursen; G B Lygre; K Dalen; V Helland; T Laegreid; J Svahn; B F Lundekvam; L Björkman
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  The association between amalgam dental surfaces and urinary mercury levels in a sample of Albertans, a prevalence study.

Authors:  Daniel J Dutton; Ken Fyie; Peter Faris; Ludovic Brunel; Jc Herbert Emery
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 2.646

7.  Genome-Wide Association Study to Identify Genes Related to Renal Mercury Concentrations in Mice.

Authors:  Hammoudi Alkaissi; Jimmy Ekstrand; Aksa Jawad; Jesper Bo Nielsen; Said Havarinasab; Peter Soderkvist; Per Hultman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.