Literature DB >> 10765181

Revisional Surgery for Failed Gastric Restrictive Procedures for Morbid Obesity.

.   

Abstract

As part of the Adelaide Obesity Surgery Study, we have reviewed all patients who have undergone revisional surgery. Of the 31 0 trial patients, 63 (20%) had revisions 1-69 (median 32) months following their original surgery-30% of all 105 gastrogastrostomy (GG) operations, 22% of 106 gastroplasty (GP) procedures, and 9% of 99 gastric bypasses (GB). Failure was due to stomal dilatation, 11% of all trial patients (71% of GG revisions), stomal stenosis, 6% (52% of GP revisions) and staple dehiscence, 4%. There was no mortality and a low hospital morbidity. Long-term success was only 23% (follow-up at least 3 years) and was achieved at considerable expense (3 reversals, 10 further revisions, 44 endoscopic procedures). Revisional surgery was successful in 45% of patients with stomal dilatation or dehiscence but in only 17% with stenosis. Overall, the most successful operation was revision of, or conversion to, gastric bypass (58% success rate), compared with gastroplasty (24%) and gastrogastrostomy (25%). Our long-term results following revisional surgery were disappointing, particularly for stenosis, and most failures followed revision to GG or GP. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is the procedure of choice when considering revision.

Entities:  

Year:  1992        PMID: 10765181     DOI: 10.1381/096089292765560123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Evidential basis in bariatric surgery].

Authors:  M K Müller; S Wildi; P-A Clavien; M Weber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  SAGES guideline for clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors: 
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Conversion of both Versions of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty to Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: Analysis of Short-term Outcomes.

Authors:  Talal Khewater; Nathalie Yercovich; Edouard Grymonprez; Isabelle Debergh; Bruno Dillemans
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Short- and long-term outcomes of vertical banded gastroplasty converted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  Peter Vasas; Bruno Dillemans; Sebastiaan Van Cauwenberge; Marieke De Visschere; Charlotte Vercauteren
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 5.  Laparoscopic conversion of vertical banded gastroplasty to a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Authors:  S Ikramuddin; T A Kellogg; D B Leslie
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-09-04       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Indications and results of reversal of vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG).

Authors:  Rebecca Thoreson; Joseph J Cullen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Three-year results of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-on-vertical banded gastroplasty: an effective and safe procedure which enables endoscopy and X-ray study of the stomach and biliary tract.

Authors:  Stefano Cariani; Enrico Amenta
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 8.  Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Timothy M Farrell; Stephen P Haggerty; D Wayne Overby; Geoffrey P Kohn; William S Richardson; Robert D Fanelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Bariatric Revisionary Surgery for Failed or Complicated Vertical Banded Gastroplasty (VBG): Comparison of VBG Reoperation (re-VBG) versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-on-VBG (RYGB-on-VBG).

Authors:  Stefano Cariani; Laura Agostinelli; Luca Leuratti; Eleonora Giorgini; Pietro Biondi; Enrico Amenta
Journal:  J Obes       Date:  2009-12-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.