B Badie1, J M Schartner. 1. Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, Madison 53792-3232, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although microglia have been suggested to be a component of the inflammatory reaction to tumors of the central nervous system, their role in glioma biology remains unknown. One obstacle to studying the function of microglia is the inability to effectively separate them from macrophages. Because flow cytometry can effectively discern immune cells with similar surface antigens, we evaluated its role in characterizing the mononuclear cell infiltration in experimental gliomas. METHODS: Freshly prepared rat C6, 9L, and RG-2 tumor specimens were labeled ex vivo with monoclonal antibodies against CD11b/c, CD45, and CD8a antigens and analyzed by flow cytometry. The extent of microglia (CD11b/c(high), CD45(low)), macrophage (CD11b/c(high), CD45(high)), and lymphocyte (CD11b/c(negative), CD45(high)) infiltration into tumors, tumor periphery, and contralateral tumor-free hemispheres was measured for each glioma type. RESULTS: Microglia, which accounted for 13 to 34% of viable cells, were distributed throughout the central nervous system and were present in the tumors, tumor periphery, and contralateral tumor-free hemispheres. In contrast, macrophages were less prominent within the tumors and tumor periphery (4.2-12%) and were scarce in the contralateral tumor-free hemispheres (0.9-1.1%). Among the tumor types, RG-2 gliomas had the least microglia/macrophage infiltration. The frequency and the distribution pattern of lymphocytes also varied among tumor models. Whereas lymphocytes accounted for more than one-third of the cells in C6 and 9L tumors, they represented only 1% of cells in RG-2 gliomas. CONCLUSION: More abundant than macrophages and scattered throughout the central nervous system, microglia account for a significant component of the inflammatory response to experimental gliomas. A better understanding of microglial function in gliomas may be important in the development of immunotherapy strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Although microglia have been suggested to be a component of the inflammatory reaction to tumors of the central nervous system, their role in glioma biology remains unknown. One obstacle to studying the function of microglia is the inability to effectively separate them from macrophages. Because flow cytometry can effectively discern immune cells with similar surface antigens, we evaluated its role in characterizing the mononuclear cell infiltration in experimental gliomas. METHODS: Freshly prepared rat C6, 9L, and RG-2 tumor specimens were labeled ex vivo with monoclonal antibodies against CD11b/c, CD45, and CD8a antigens and analyzed by flow cytometry. The extent of microglia (CD11b/c(high), CD45(low)), macrophage (CD11b/c(high), CD45(high)), and lymphocyte (CD11b/c(negative), CD45(high)) infiltration into tumors, tumor periphery, and contralateral tumor-free hemispheres was measured for each glioma type. RESULTS: Microglia, which accounted for 13 to 34% of viable cells, were distributed throughout the central nervous system and were present in the tumors, tumor periphery, and contralateral tumor-free hemispheres. In contrast, macrophages were less prominent within the tumors and tumor periphery (4.2-12%) and were scarce in the contralateral tumor-free hemispheres (0.9-1.1%). Among the tumor types, RG-2 gliomas had the least microglia/macrophage infiltration. The frequency and the distribution pattern of lymphocytes also varied among tumor models. Whereas lymphocytes accounted for more than one-third of the cells in C6 and 9L tumors, they represented only 1% of cells in RG-2 gliomas. CONCLUSION: More abundant than macrophages and scattered throughout the central nervous system, microglia account for a significant component of the inflammatory response to experimental gliomas. A better understanding of microglial function in gliomas may be important in the development of immunotherapy strategies.
Authors: Theresa Barberi; Allison Martin; Rahul Suresh; David J Barakat; Sarah Harris-Bookman; Charles G Drake; Michael Lim; Alan D Friedman Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2018-07-21 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Orin Bloch; Courtney A Crane; Rajwant Kaur; Michael Safaee; Martin J Rutkowski; Andrew T Parsa Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-04-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Huaqing Wang; Leying Zhang; Ian Y Zhang; Xuebo Chen; Anna Da Fonseca; Shihua Wu; Hui Ren; Sam Badie; Sam Sadeghi; Mao Ouyang; Charles D Warden; Behnam Badie Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-05-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Konrad Gabrusiewicz; Benjamin Rodriguez; Jun Wei; Yuuri Hashimoto; Luke M Healy; Sourindra N Maiti; Ginu Thomas; Shouhao Zhou; Qianghu Wang; Ahmed Elakkad; Brandon D Liebelt; Nasser K Yaghi; Ravesanker Ezhilarasan; Neal Huang; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Sujit S Prabhu; Ganesh Rao; Raymond Sawaya; Lauren A Langford; Janet M Bruner; Gregory N Fuller; Amit Bar-Or; Wei Li; Rivka R Colen; Michael A Curran; Krishna P Bhat; Jack P Antel; Laurence J Cooper; Erik P Sulman; Amy B Heimberger Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-02-25