Literature DB >> 10764015

Rabbit facial nerve regeneration in autologous nerve grafts after antecedent injury.

J G Spector1, P Lee, A Derby.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The effect of incomplete antecedent injuries on subsequent facial nerve regeneration within cable graft repairs is not known. The purpose of this study is to compare facial nerve regeneration after an immediate and delayed neural cable graft repair.
METHOD: Rabbit facial nerve regeneration after complete transectional injuries of the buccal division was compared in two experimental models. In one, a 10-mm segment of the nerve was transected, rotated 180 degrees, and immediately repaired as a cable graft (N=8). In the second, a preliminary nerve crush was allowed to recover over a 4-week period and a 10-mm segment of nerve centered on the crush site was then transected, rotated 180 degrees, and delay repaired as a cable graft (N = 7). Data are presented as total numbers of regenerating myelinated axons that traverse the surgical repair to innervate the cable graft and distal nerve stumps, as well as the percentage of regenerating neurites compared with preoperative pooled and individual controls. Subpopulations of regenerating neurons are delineated to quantify the pattern of neural innervation.
RESULTS: Five weeks after cable graft repair both groups had similar myelinated outgrowth from the proximal nerve stump across the proximal anastomosis to innervate the cable graft (3995 +/- 1209 vs. 3284 +/- 651; P = .89). However, the delayed repair group had more intrafascicular regeneration within cable grafts (2261 +/- 931 vs. 1660 +/- 1169; P = .02) and distal nerve stump (1532 +/- 281 vs. 445 +/- 120; P = .004) than the immediate repair group. The immediate repair group had greater extrafascicular nerve regeneration in the cable graft (2335 +/- 1954 vs. 437 +/- 236; P = .001) and more myelin and axonal debris in pre-existing neural fascicles of the cable graft (P = .02) and distal nerve stump (463 +/- 187 vs. 103 +/- 87; P = .02).
CONCLUSIONS: Antecedent priming lesions do not enhance axonal survival as determined by regenerating myelinated axonal counts. However, antecedent injuries enhance the efficiency of neural innervation of the affected mimetic musculature by increasing the number of myelinated intrafascicular neural regenerants in the cable graft and distal nerve stump. This is accomplished by two factors: increased perineural fibrosis and decreased intrafascicular myelin and axonal debris.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10764015     DOI: 10.1097/00005537-200004000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  7 in total

1.  Chondroitinase applied to peripheral nerve repair averts retrograde axonal regeneration.

Authors:  James B Graham; Debbie Neubauer; Qing-Shan Xue; David Muir
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Vitamin D3 potentiates myelination and recovery after facial nerve injury.

Authors:  Marion Montava; Stéphane Garcia; Julien Mancini; Yves Jammes; Joël Courageot; Jean-Pierre Lavieille; François Feron
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-09-27       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Efficacy of glial growth factor and nerve growth factor on the recovery of traumatic facial paralysis.

Authors:  Mucahit Yildiz; Turgut Karlidag; Sinasi Yalcin; Candan Ozogul; Erol Keles; Hayrettin Cengiz Alpay; Muhammed Yanilmaz
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-01-23       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Chitosan Tubes Inoculated with Dental Pulp Stem Cells and Stem Cell Factor Enhance Facial Nerve-Vascularized Regeneration in Rabbits.

Authors:  Xiaodan Mu; Huawei Liu; Shuhui Yang; Yongfeng Li; Lei Xiang; Min Hu; Xiumei Wang
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-05-26

Review 5.  Facial Nerve Repair: Bioengineering Approaches in Preclinical Models.

Authors:  Fuat Baris Bengur; Conrad Stoy; Mary A Binko; Wayne Vincent Nerone; Caroline Nadia Fedor; Mario G Solari; Kacey G Marra
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 7.376

6.  Mandibular branch of the facial nerve in wistar rats: new experimental model to assess facial nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Raquel Salomone; Silvia Bona do Nascimento; Ricardo Jose Rodriguez Ferreira; Ciro Ferreira da Silva; Heloisa Juliana Zabeu Rossi Costa
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-05-23

7.  Stem Cells from Human Exfoliated Deciduous Teeth (SHED) Differentiate in vivo and Promote Facial Nerve Regeneration.

Authors:  Larissa Vilela Pereira; Ricardo Ferreira Bento; Dayane B Cruz; Cláudia Marchi; Raquel Salomone; Jeanne Oiticicca; Márcio Paulino Costa; Luciana A Haddad; Regina Célia Mingroni-Netto; Heloisa Juliana Zabeu Rossi Costa
Journal:  Cell Transplant       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.064

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.