Literature DB >> 10763479

Longitudinal tracking and retention in a school-based study on adolescent smoking: costs, variables, and smoking status.

C A Mills1, L L Pederson, J J Koval, S M Gushue, J A Aubut.   

Abstract

Methods used to track a cohort of Grade 6 students through Grades 8 and 11, and costs involved for survey completion in school and by mail for ever and never smokers from the original group are detailed. At baseline, 1,598 students in Scarborough, Canada, completed a questionnaire on smoking, drinking, and health, and again in Grade 8 (N = 1,543/1,598) and Grade 11 (N = 1,454/1,598). In Grades 8 and 11, tracking and administering the questionnaire was more costly per participant when the survey was administered by mail than in school. Average completion costs were highest for Grade 11 students who used tobacco at baseline ($52.44). Students categorized as ever smokers in Grade 6 were harder to locate at each phase of testing, which suggests that this group should be identified at baseline so that closer tracking procedures may be employed between data collection points.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10763479     DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2000.tb06455.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sch Health        ISSN: 0022-4391            Impact factor:   2.118


  4 in total

1.  Recruitment and retention strategies for an urban adolescent study: Lessons learned from a multi-center study of community-based asthma self-management intervention for adolescents.

Authors:  Annette Grape; Hyekyun Rhee; Mona Wicks; Laurene Tumiel-Berhalter; Elizabeth Sloand
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2018-03-26

2.  Psychosocial determinants of attrition in a longitudinal study of tobacco use in youth.

Authors:  Ann Post; Hans Gilljam; Sven Bremberg; Maria Rosaria Galanti
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-05-02

3.  Recruitment and retention strategies and the examination of attrition bias in a randomised controlled trial in children's centres serving families in disadvantaged areas of England.

Authors:  Paul Hindmarch; Adrian Hawkins; Elaine McColl; Mike Hayes; Gosia Majsak-Newman; Joanne Ablewhite; Toity Deave; Denise Kendrick
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 4.  A systematic review of the effect of retention methods in population-based cohort studies.

Authors:  Cara L Booker; Seeromanie Harding; Michaela Benzeval
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.295

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.