Literature DB >> 10762744

Estimates of the lifetime costs of breast cancer treatment in Canada.

B P Will1, J M Berthelot, C Le Petit, E M Tomiak, S Verma, W K Evans.   

Abstract

A comprehensive understanding of the cost components of common illnesses is a necessary first step towards ensuring optimal use of scarce healthcare resources. Since breast cancer is the commonest malignancy affecting Canadian women, we estimated the direct healthcare costs associated with the lifetime management of a cohort of 17700 women diagnosed in 1995. Using a multiplicity of data sources, treatment algorithms, follow-up and disease progression patterns were determined by age (<50; >/=50 years) for all four stages of breast cancer at diagnosis, as well as for the management of local and distant recurrence. Statistics Canada's Population Health Model (POHEM) was used to integrate the data from the different sources and to estimate the lifetime costs, discounted at 0, 3 and 5% rates. The average undiscounted lifetime cost per case of treating women diagnosed with breast cancer varied by stage, from $36,340 for stage IV or metastatic disease, to $23,275 for stage I patients. The total cost of treatment for the cohort diagnosed in 1995 was estimated to be over 454 million Canadian dollars. Hospitalisation (mainly for initial treatment and terminal care) represented 63% of the lifetime costs of care delivery. Disease costing models are valuable tools for optimising the use of scare resources without compromising the health status of individual patients. The breast cancer costing model has recently been used to assess the cost impact and cost-effectiveness of providing radiotherapy to all patients undergoing breast surgery, and of performing outpatient breast surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10762744     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(99)00340-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  42 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of antiaromatase agents in the second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Shailendra Verma; Angela Rocchi
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-07-22       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  The cost-utility of adjuvant chemotherapy using docetaxel and cyclophosphamide compared with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide in breast cancer.

Authors:  T Younis; D Rayson; C Skedgel
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer: a review of cost considerations and cost effectiveness.

Authors:  Jonathan Karnon
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Economic evaluation of hormonal therapies for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer in Canada.

Authors:  S Djalalov; J Beca; E Amir; M Krahn; M E Trudeau; J S Hoch
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

5.  A Canadian economic analysis of U.S. Oncology Adjuvant Trial 9735.

Authors:  L M Bernard; S Verma; M F Thompson; B C F Chan; N Mittmann; L Asma; S E Jones
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Cost-utility analysis of 21-gene assay for node-positive early breast cancer.

Authors:  L Masucci; S Torres; A Eisen; M Trudeau; I Tyono; H Saunders; K W Chan; W Isaranuwatchai
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Health system costs for stage-specific breast cancer: a population-based approach.

Authors:  N Mittmann; J M Porter; J Rangrej; S J Seung; N Liu; R Saskin; M C Cheung; N B Leighl; J S Hoch; M Trudeau; W K Evans; K N Dainty; C DeAngelis; C C Earle
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Validation of a decision model for preventive pharmacological strategies in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Sylvie Perreault; Carey Levinton; Claudine Laurier; Yola Moride; Louis-Georges Ste-Marie; Ralph Crott
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Cost effectiveness of TAC versus FAC in adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  N Mittmann; S Verma; M Koo; K Alloul; M Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.677

10.  Investigating the complementary value of discrete choice experiments for the evaluation of barriers and facilitators in implementation research: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  Debby van Helvoort-Postulart; Trudy van der Weijden; Benedict G C Dellaert; Mascha de Kok; Maarten F von Meyenfeldt; Carmen D Dirksen
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.