Literature DB >> 10759997

Breast cancer screening use by African Americans and Whites in an HMO.

L M Reisch1, M B Barton, S W Fletcher, W Kreuter, J G Elmore.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine racial differences in breast cancer screening in an HMO that provides screening at no cost.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of breast cancer screening among African-American and white women. Breast cancer screening information was extracted from computerized medical records.
SETTING: A large HMO in New England. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: White and African-American women (N = 2,072) enrolled for at least 10 years in the HMO. MAIN
RESULTS: Primary care clinicians documented recommending a screening mammogram significantly more often for African Americans than whites (70% vs 64%; P <.001). During the 10-year period, on average, white women obtained more mammograms (4.49 vs 3.93; P <.0001) and clinical breast examinations (5.35 vs 4.92; P <.01) than African-American women. However, a woman's race was no longer a statistically significant predictor of breast cancer screening after adjustment for differences in age, estimated household income, estrogen use, and body mass index (adjusted number of mammograms, 4.47 vs 4.25, P =.17; and adjusted number of clinical breast examinations, 5.35 vs 5. 31, P =.87).
CONCLUSIONS: In this HMO, African-American and white women obtained breast cancer screening at similar rates. Comparisons with national data showed much higher screening rates in this HMO for both white and African-American women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10759997      PMCID: PMC1495437          DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2000.01339.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  1989 survey of physicians' attitudes and practices in early cancer detection.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Use of mammography--United States, 1990.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1990-09-14       Impact factor: 17.586

3.  Black/white differences in type of initial breast cancer treatment and implications for survival.

Authors:  W P McWhorter; W J Mayer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Differences in physician prevention practice patterns for white and minority patients.

Authors:  D H Gemson; J Elinson; P Messeri
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1988

5.  Social class and black-white differences in breast cancer survival.

Authors:  M T Bassett; N Krieger
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Socio-economic factors in the prognosis of cancer patients.

Authors:  L Lipworth; T Abelin; R R Connelly
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1970-08

7.  Economic status and survival of cancer patients.

Authors:  J W Berg; R Ross; H B Latourette
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Racial differences in survival of women with breast cancer.

Authors:  R P Bain; R S Greenberg; J P Whitaker
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

9.  Cancer patient survival among ethnic groups in the United States.

Authors:  J L Young; L G Ries; E S Pollack
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Race-related differences in breast cancer patients. Results of the 1982 national survey of breast cancer by the American College of Surgeons.

Authors:  N Natarajan; T Nemoto; C Mettlin; G P Murphy
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Disparities in screening mammography. Current status, interventions and implications.

Authors:  Monica E Peek; Jini H Han
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Do patient expectations about arthroplasty at initial presentation for hip or knee pain differ by sex and ethnicity?

Authors:  Carlos J Lavernia; Juan S Contreras; Javad Parvizi; Peter F Sharkey; Robert Barrack; Mark D Rossi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Disease-free probability after the first primary ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a comparison between African-American and White-American women.

Authors:  Azadeh Stark; Robert Stapp; Aditya Raghunathan; Xiaowei Yan; H Lester Kirchner; Jennifer Griggs; Lisa Newman; Dhananjay Chitale; Andrew Dick
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-08-27       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Utilization of screening mammography among middle-aged and older women.

Authors:  Matthew Lee Smith; Angela K Hochhalter; SangNam Ahn; Meghan M Wernicke; Marcia G Ory
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  Racial differences in breast cancer screening, knowledge and compliance.

Authors:  Dawne M Harris; Jane E Miller; Diane M Davis
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.798

6.  Racial differences in follow-up of abnormal mammography findings among economically disadvantaged women.

Authors:  Swann A Adams; Emily R Smith; James Hardin; Irene Prabhu-Das; Jeanette Fulton; James R Hebert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Patient attitudes regarding healthcare utilization and referral: a descriptive comparison in African- and Caucasian Americans with chronic pain.

Authors:  Carmen R Green; Tamara A Baker; S Khady Ndao-Brumblay
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.798

8.  Breast and colorectal cancer risk communication approaches with low-income African-American and Hispanic women: implications for healthcare providers.

Authors:  Renee Royak-Schaler; Deborah E Blocker; Ann Marie Yali; Monica Bynoe; Katherine Josa Briant; Shannon Smith
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.798

9.  An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Christine M Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Babalola Faseru; Stacy Braiuca; Stephanie Joseph; Edward F Ellerbeck; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  A simulation model approach to analysis of the business case for eliminating health care disparities.

Authors:  David R Nerenz; Yung-wen Liu; Keoki L Williams; Kaan Tunceli; Huiwen Zeng
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-03-19       Impact factor: 4.615

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.