Literature DB >> 10759668

The relationship between early biochemical failure and perineural invasion in pathological T2 prostate cancer.

J Endrizzi1, T Seay.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate, in patients with pathologically localized prostate cancer, the relationship between early biochemical failure, i.e. an increasing prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and perineural invasion (PNI) on final pathology. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The records were reviewed of 171 patients with prostate cancer who underwent prostatectomy at one institution between January 1992 and December 1995. Data on the histology, therapy and PSA level were collected and evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the 171 patients with pathologically localized (pT2) prostate cancer, 131 were evaluable; 17 (13%) had a detectable PSA level in the first 5 years after surgery and 63 had PNI in the pathological specimen. Of those with PSA recurrence, 14 had PNI, one had no PNI and in two there was no comment on PNI. In comparison, only 10 of the 17 patients with recurrence had a Gleason sum of >/= 7.
CONCLUSION: Perineural invasion seems to be an important predictor of early outcome in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer treated by prostatectomy. In this series it was the most sensitive predictor of biochemical failure. A more detailed pathological evaluation of prostate cancer may allow the clinician to provide closer surveillance and better informed clinical decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10759668     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00518.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  7 in total

1.  Does perineural invasion in a radical prostatectomy specimen predict biochemical recurrence in men with prostate cancer?

Authors:  Fairleigh Reeves; Christopher M Hovens; Laurence Harewood; Shane Battye; Justin S Peters; Anthony J Costello; Niall M Corcoran
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  [Histopathology reports of findings of prostate needle biopsies. Individual treatment].

Authors:  I Damjanoski; J Müller; T J Schnöller; R Küfer; L Rinnab
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Prediction of perineural invasion and its prognostic value in patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jun Taik Lee; Seungsoo Lee; Chang Jin Yun; Byung Joo Jeon; Jung Man Kim; Hong Koo Ha; Wan Lee; Moon Kee Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-11-17

4.  Prediction of pathological and oncological outcomes based on extended prostate biopsy results in patients with prostate cancer receiving radical prostatectomy: a single institution study.

Authors:  Fumio Ishizaki; Noboru Hara; Hiroshi Koike; Makoto Kawaguchi; Akira Tadokoro; Itsuhiro Takizawa; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Kota Takahashi; Rudolf Hohenfellner
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Prognostic factors for the development of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed F Kotb; Ahmed A Elabbady
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-06-15

7.  The Perineural Invasion Paradox: Is Perineural Invasion an Independent Prognostic Indicator of Biochemical Recurrence Risk in Patients With pT2N0R0 Prostate Cancer? A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Ryan Douglas Kraus; Andrew Barsky; Lingyun Ji; Patricia Mae Garcia Santos; Nathan Cheng; Susan Groshen; Neha Vapiwala; Leslie K Ballas
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-09-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.