| Literature DB >> 10759160 |
B Rudinsky1, R Hipps, A Bell, M Lozon, W Meadow.
Abstract
We studied the hemodynamic responses of 29 anesthetized and mechanically ventilated piglets to acute hypoxia [reduction of Pao2 from 130 to 38 mm Hg induced by inhalation of 7% fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio2) for 7.5 min] before and during group B beta-hemolytic streptococci (GBS) sepsis. During hypoxia, nonseptic piglets maintained stable systemic blood pressure [105+/-9 (SD) to 97+/-14 mm Hg] and cardiac output (CO) (667+/-72 to 685+/-113 mL/min). However, during GBS/hypoxia, systemic blood pressure fell from 94+/-17 to 49+/-25 mm Hg, CO fell from 397+/-146 to 223+/-142 mL/min (both p < 0.001 versus pre-GBS), and cardiac arrest often ensued. We tested three hypotheses that might underlie GBS-induced intolerance to systemic hypoxia: 1) GBS-induced reduction of systemic CO/systemic oxygen delivery (QO2) below a critical QO2 beyond which the superimposition of hypoxia becomes intolerable; this mechanism is unlikely as nonseptic piglets with comparable reductions in CO/QO2 (induced by inflation of a left atrial balloon) tolerated hypoxia well; 2) GBS-induced inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis that is vital to tolerance of hypoxia; this mechanism is unlikely as infusion of the NO substrate L-arginine did not restore tolerance to hypoxia during GBS infusion (as it did after inhibition of NO synthesis during infusion of N-nitro-L-arginine in nonseptic piglets); and 3) GBS-induced production of pathologic prostaglandins that impaired the piglet's capacity to tolerate hypoxia; this mechanism finds support in the observation that inhibition of prostaglandins with the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin completely restored the ability of septic piglets to tolerate hypoxia. Further evaluation of GBS-induced intolerance to systemic hypoxia may provide insight into the incompletely understood mechanisms by which sepsis induces circulatory collapse in experimental animals and in humans.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10759160 DOI: 10.1203/00006450-200004000-00017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pediatr Res ISSN: 0031-3998 Impact factor: 3.756