Literature DB >> 10758966

Echocardiographic predictors of clinical outcome in patients with left ventricular dysfunction enrolled in the SOLVD registry and trials: significance of left ventricular hypertrophy. Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

M A Quiñones1, B H Greenberg, H A Kopelen, C Koilpillai, M C Limacher, D M Shindler, B J Shelton, D H Weiner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the relation of left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) dimensions, ejection fraction (EF) and LV mass to subsequent clinical outcome of patients with LV dysfunction enrolled in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) Registry and Trials.
BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the relation of LV mass to prognosis in patients with LV dysfunction and on the interaction of LV mass with other measurements of LV size and function as they relate to clinical outcome.
METHODS: A cohort of 1,172 patients enrolled in the SOLVD Trials (n = 577) and Registry (n = 595) had baseline echocardiographic measurements and follow-up for 1 year.
RESULTS: After adjusting for age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, Trial vs. Registry and ischemic etiology, a 1-SD difference in EF was inversely associated with an increased risk of death (risk ratio, 1.62; p = 0.0008) and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization (risk ratio, 1.59; p = 0.0001). Consequently, the other echo parameters were adjusted for EF in addition to age, NYHA functional class, Trial vs. Registry and ischemic etiology. A 1-SD difference in LV mass was associated with increased risk of death (risk ratio of 1.3, p = 0.012) and CV hospitalization (risk ratio of 1.17, p = 0.018). Similar results were observed with the LA dimension (mortality risk ratio, 1.32; p < 0.02; CV hospitalizations risk ratio, 1.18; p < 0.04). Likewise, LV mass > or =298 g and LA dimension > or =4.17 cm were associated with increased risk of death and CV hospitalization. An end-systolic dimension >5.0 cm was associated with increased mortality only. A protective effect of EF was noted in patients with LV mass > or =298 g (those in the group with EF >35% had lower mortality) but not in the group with LV mass <298 g.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients with LV dysfunction enrolled in the SOLVD Registry and Trials, increasing levels of hypertrophy are associated with adverse events. A protective effect of EF was noted in patients with LV mass > or =298 g (those in the group with EF >35% fared better) but not in the group with LV mass <298 g. These data support the development and use of drugs that can inhibit hypertrophy or alter its characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10758966     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00511-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  66 in total

Review 1.  Modulation of left atrial function by ventricular filling impairment.

Authors:  A Rossi; P Zardini; P Marino
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Cardiac remodeling as therapeutic target: treating heart failure with Cardiac Support Devices.

Authors:  Douglas L Mann
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  3D Echo-Based Patient-Specific Computational Left Ventricle Models to Quantify Material Properties and Stress/Strain Differences between Ventricles with and without Infarct.

Authors:  Rui Fan; Dalin Tang; Jing Yao; Chun Yang; Di Xu
Journal:  Comput Model Eng Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.593

4.  Echocardiographic monitoring of patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Amra Macić-Dzanković; Fuad Dzanković; Belma Pojskić; Amira Skopljak
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.363

5.  Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bénédicte Belge; Emmanuel Coche; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Left atrial Frank-Starling law assessed by real-time, three-dimensional echocardiographic left atrial volume changes.

Authors:  Ashraf M Anwar; Marcel L Geleijnse; Osama I I Soliman; Attila Nemes; Folkert J ten Cate
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-05-13       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Hospital-level variation in use of cardiovascular testing for adults with incident heart failure: findings from the cardiovascular research network heart failure study.

Authors:  Steven A Farmer; Justin Lenzo; David J Magid; Jerry H Gurwitz; David H Smith; Grace Hsu; Sue Hee Sung; Alan S Go
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-06-18

8.  Relation of left ventricular mass at age 23 to 35 years to global left ventricular systolic function 20 years later (from the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults study).

Authors:  Satoru Kishi; Anderson C Armstrong; Samuel S Gidding; David R Jacobs; Stephen Sidney; Cora E Lewis; Pamela J Schreiner; Kiang Liu; João A C Lima
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Single-beat determination of global longitudinal speckle strain in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Kazuto Yamaguchi; Hiroyuki Yoshitomi; Saki Ito; Tomoko Adachi; Nobuyuki Takahashi; Kazuaki Tanabe
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2012-07-26

Review 10.  Increased left ventricular mass as a predictor of sudden cardiac death: is it time to put it to the test?

Authors:  Steven M Stevens; Kyndaron Reinier; Sumeet S Chugh
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.