Literature DB >> 10758438

Haemodynamic management of a patient with septic shock.

K Reinhart1, S G Sakka, A Meier-Hellmann.   

Abstract

For supportive therapy in sepsis, an adequate volume loading is likely the first step, and possibly the most important step in the treatment of patients with septic shock. However, it is still a matter of debate what kind of fluids, endpoints for resuscitation and monitoring techniques should be used. Nevertheless, therapies which closely control volume loading and regional perfusion are becoming more utilized. An elevated global O2-supply (DO2) may be necessary and beneficial in most of these patients but the increase of DO2 should be guided by the measurement of parameters assessing global and regional oxygenation. Routine strategies for elevating DO2 by the use of very high dosages of catecholamines cannot be recommended. Vasopressors should be used to achieve an adequate perfusion pressure. With norepinephrine, no negative effects on regional perfusion have been demonstrated when the patient is adequately volume resuscitated and the DO2 is normal or even slightly elevated. In contrast, epinephrine should be avoided because it seems to redistribute blood flow away from the splanchnic region. There is controversy whether dopamine should still be used as a first-line drug in patients with septic shock, because there are some clinical and experimental data that indicate unfavourable effects on mucosal perfusion of the gut. To date, there are no convincing data to support the routine use of low-dose dopamine or dopexamine in patients with sepsis. Neither low-dose dopamine nor dopexamine have been proven to prevent renal failure in septic patients. Furthermore, there is evidence that low-dose dopamine may reduce mucosal perfusion in the gut in some patients. Dopexamine has been suggested to improve splanchnic perfusion but because these effects remain somewhat controversial, there is as yet no reason for a general recommendation for dopexamine in septic patients. These recommendations are currently limited by the lack of sufficient outcome studies and studies which evaluate regional perfusion. Until the various catecholamine regimes are more fully examined, recommendations for catecholamine support in sepsis must be considered 'conditional'.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10758438     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.2000.00575.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  7 in total

1.  Hemodynamic variables related to outcome in septic shock.

Authors:  Marjut Varpula; Minna Tallgren; Katri Saukkonen; Liisa-Maria Voipio-Pulkki; Ville Pettilä
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Terlipressin as a rescue therapy for catecholamine-resistant septic shock in children.

Authors:  Dincer Yildizdas; Hacer Yapicioglu; Umit Celik; Yasar Sertdemir; Emre Alhan
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Clinical review: the Israeli experience: conventional terrorism and critical care.

Authors:  Gabriella Aschkenasy-Steuer; Micha Shamir; Avraham Rivkind; Rami Mosheiff; Yigal Shushan; Guy Rosenthal; Yoav Mintz; Charles Weissman; Charles L Sprung; Yoram G Weiss
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 9.097

4.  Small volume of hypertonic saline as the initial fluid replacement in experimental hypodynamic sepsis.

Authors:  Alejandra del Pilar Gallardo Garrido; Ruy Jorge Cruz; Luiz Francisco Poli de Figueiredo; Maurício Rocha e Silva
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Vasopressors in septic shock: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Feihu Zhou; Zhi Mao; Xiantao Zeng; Hongjun Kang; Hui Liu; Liang Pan; Peter C Hou
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Coupled plasma filtration adsorption for the treatment of sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuting Li; Hongxiang Li; Jianxing Guo; Youquan Wang; Dong Zhang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Severe sepsis: variation in resource and therapeutic modality use among academic centers.

Authors:  D Tony Yu; Edgar Black; Kenneth E Sands; J Sanford Schwartz; Patricia L Hibberd; Paul S Graman; Paul N Lanken; Katherine L Kahn; David R Snydman; Jeffrey Parsonnet; Richard Moore; Richard Platt; David W Bates
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2003-03-17       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.