Literature DB >> 10758076

Work ability assessed by patients and their GPs in new episodes of sickness certification.

H Reiso1, J F Nygârd, S Brage, P Gulbrandsen, G Tellnes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sickness certification legislation demands that work ability is reduced due to disease or injury. Most sickness certificates are issued by GPs. Assessment of work ability might introduce conflict in the doctor-patient relationship.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the level of work ability assessments by patients and their GPs in new episodes of sickness certification, and to explore how medical conditions and work demands are associated with the assessments.
METHODS: Forty nine GPs supplied data about 408 patients certified sick <8 days before questionnaires were filled in. A total of 268 (66%) patients completed corresponding questionnaires. Patients and GPs independently answered the following question using a five-point scale: "To what degree is your (the patient's) ability to perform your (his or her) ordinary, remunerative work reduced today?"
RESULTS: Work ability was assessed by patients as very much or much reduced in 66%, moderately reduced in 23% and not much or hardly reduced at all in 11% of the cases. Corresponding assessments made by GPs were 71, 27 and 2%. Patients and GPs agreed well on their assessments (+/- 1 answer category) in 81% (216/266) of the cases. The patients assessed work ability as more reduced the more stressful or physically strenuous their jobs were, and the older their GPs were. The GPs assessed work ability as more reduced the more their assessments were based on clinical findings.
CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between work ability assessments made by patients and GPs was high, despite patients' assessments being associated with work demands and GPs' with medical conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10758076     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  16 in total

1.  Swedish managers' experience-based understanding of the Capacity to work in employees with Common Mental Disorders: a Focus Group Study.

Authors:  Ellinor Tengelin; Gunnel Hensing; Kristina Holmgren; Christian Ståhl; Monica Bertilsson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-04

2.  Is cancer survivorship associated with reduced work engagement? A NOCWO Study.

Authors:  Saevar Berg Gudbergsson; Sophie D Fosså; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Sickness certification system in the United Kingdom: qualitative study of views of general practitioners in Scotland.

Authors:  Susan Hussey; Pat Hoddinott; Phil Wilson; Jon Dowell; Rosaline Barbour
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-12-22

4.  A study of work changes due to cancer in tumor-free primary-treated cancer patients. A NOCWO study.

Authors:  Saevar Berg Gudbergsson; Sophie D Fosså; Alv A Dahl
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Return to work expectations of workers on long-term non-work-related sick leave.

Authors:  Maite Sampere; David Gimeno; Consol Serra; Manel Plana; Juan Carlos López; José Miguel Martínez; George L Delclos; Fernando G Benavides
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-03

6.  Swedish social insurance officers' experiences of difficulties in assessing applications for disability pensions--an interview study.

Authors:  Berit Ydreborg; Kerstin Ekberg; Kerstin Nilsson
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.295

7.  Implementing structured functional assessments in general practice for persons with long-term sick leave: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Nina Østerås; Pål Gulbrandsen; Jūrate Saltyte Benth; Dag Hofoss; Søren Brage
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 2.497

8.  Determinants for return to work among sickness certified patients in general practice.

Authors:  Anna-Sophia von Celsing; Kurt Svärdsudd; Hans-G Eriksson; Karin Björkegren; Margaretha Eriksson; Thorne Wallman
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A randomised comparison of a four- and a five-point scale version of the Norwegian Function Assessment Scale.

Authors:  Nina Østerås; Pål Gulbrandsen; Andrew Garratt; Jūratë Saltytë Benth; Fredrik A Dahl; Bård Natvig; Søren Brage
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Between health care and social security--psychiatric patients and the disability pension system in Norway and Russia.

Authors:  Grigory Rezvyy; Walter Schönfelder; Terje Øiesvold; Reidun Olstad; Georges Midré
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.