Literature DB >> 10758072

GPs' recognition of, and response to, influences on patients' medicine taking: the implications for communication.

F A Stevenson1, D Gerrett, P Rivers, G Wallace.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research evidence suggests that patients' beliefs about medicines influence medicine taking. Therefore, it is important that GPs are able to both identify and take account of such beliefs in the consultation.
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to explore GPs' awareness of asthma patients' beliefs about medicine, and of the ways in which friends and family, television programmes and the Campaign for Asthma may influence these beliefs. We also wanted to consider how GPs believe they would feel, and their likely behaviour, when a patient refers to these influences in the consultation.
METHOD: Four events, drawn from 17 semi-structured interviews previously conducted with patients recently prescribed oral steroids (prednisolone), were used to compose a narrative account of a hypothetical patient's behaviour. The narrative described a series of scenarios to which GPs were asked to respond. It was sent to all GPs in Derbyshire (n = 476).
RESULTS: The response rate was 69%. Half judged that the scenarios which presented the patients' beliefs about medicine, the influence of friends and family and the television were not 'realistic'. GPs also reported feeling more 'supportive' and 'sympathetic' towards the Campaign for Asthma as a source of patient information than they were towards opinions based on advice given by patients' family and friends.
CONCLUSION: Developing 'common ground' in the consultation will be problematic if GPs are not aware of, and sympathetic towards, the ways in which patients use information from a range of sources to formulate beliefs that then affect their medicine-taking behaviour. GPs should be encouraged to open up their discussions with patients so as to encourage the development of a partnership in which each party is aware of, and respects, the other's point of view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10758072     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.2.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  4 in total

1.  Factors associated with the difference in score between women's and doctors' decisional conflict about hormone therapy: a multilevel regression analysis.

Authors:  France Légaré; Stéphane Tremblay; Annette M O'Connor; Ian D Graham; Georges A Wells; Mary Jane Jacobsen
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Optimal management of asthma in elderly patients: strategies to improve adherence to recommended interventions.

Authors:  Dianne P Goeman; Jo A Douglass
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.923

3.  An ethnographic exploration of influences on prescribing in general practice: why is there variation in prescribing practices?

Authors:  Aileen Grant; Frank Sullivan; Jon Dowell
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Enhancing communication about paediatric medicines: lessons from a qualitative study of parents' experiences of their child's suspected adverse drug reaction.

Authors:  Janine Arnott; Hannah Hesselgreaves; Anthony J Nunn; Matthew Peak; Munir Pirmohamed; Rosalind L Smyth; Mark A Turner; Bridget Young
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.