Literature DB >> 10757700

Timing and intensity variability in the metronomic speech of stuttering and nonstuttering speakers.

F R Boutsen1, G J Brutten, C R Watts.   

Abstract

The timing and intensity variability of 8 adults who stutter and 8 age-matched fluent speakers was investigated under metronomic conditions. Participants were required to produce double or triple-stress patterns at a slow speech rate (1 syllable/870 ms) when repeating the syllable /staet/or/straet/nine times. Measures that are sensitive to cyclic rather than overall variation in syllable timing and intensity were employed. Specifically, durational variation between successive syllable onsets as well as intensity variation of the beginning consonant and vowel in successive syllables were computed. Results revealed that, although intensity variation was similar, the timing of successive syllables of persons who stutter was significantly more variable than that of persons who do not stutter. These outcomes are discussed in relation to previous experiments of timing control of persons who stutter and normally fluent persons during metronomic stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10757700     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4302.513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  11 in total

1.  Motor practice effects and sensorimotor integration in adults who stutter: Evidence from visuomotor tracking performance.

Authors:  Victoria Tumanova; Patricia M Zebrowski; Shawn S Goodman; Richard M Arenas
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.538

2.  Adults who stutter and metronome synchronization: evidence for a nonspeech timing deficit.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Evidence that a motor timing deficit is a factor in the development of stuttering.

Authors:  Lindsey Olander; Anne Smith; Howard N Zelaznik
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Evidence for a rhythm perception deficit in children who stutter.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wieland; J Devin McAuley; Laura C Dilley; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Cerebellar activity and stuttering: comments on Max and Yudman (2003).

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Timing variability of sensorimotor integration during vocalization in individuals who stutter.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Neural Correlates of Vocal Pitch Compensation in Individuals Who Stutter.

Authors:  Anastasia G Sares; Mickael L D Deroche; Hiroki Ohashi; Douglas M Shiller; Vincent L Gracco
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Abnormal Sensorimotor Integration in Adults Who Stutter: A Behavioral Study by Adaptation of Delayed Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Daichi Iimura; Nobuhiko Asakura; Takafumi Sasaoka; Toshio Inui
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-10-31

9.  Non-verbal sensorimotor timing deficits in children and adolescents who stutter.

Authors:  Simone Falk; Thilo Müller; Simone Dalla Bella
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-06

10.  Behavioral and multimodal neuroimaging evidence for a deficit in brain timing networks in stuttering: a hypothesis and theory.

Authors:  Andrew C Etchell; Blake W Johnson; Paul F Sowman
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.