Literature DB >> 10756609

A randomized trial of three marketing strategies to disseminate a screening and brief alcohol intervention programme to general practitioners.

C A Lock1, E F Kaner, N Heather, B R McAvoy, E Gilvarry.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research findings are of little benefit to patients or society if they do not reach the audience they are intended to influence. A dissemination strategy is needed to target new findings at its user group and encourage a process of consideration and adoption or rejection. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of different marketing strategies for the dissemination of a screening and brief alcohol intervention (SBI) programme to general practitioners (GPs).
METHOD: Seven hundred and twenty-nine GPs, one per practice, from the former Northern and Yorkshire Regional Health Authority were randomly assigned to one of three marketing strategies: postal marketing (mailing a promotional brochure to GPs), telemarketing (following a script to market the programme over the telephone), and personal marketing (following the same script during face-to-face marketing at GPs' practices). GPs who took up the programme were asked if they would agree to use it. Outcome measures included the proportions of GPs who took up the programme and agreement to use it.
RESULTS: Of the 614 GPs eligible for the study, 321 (52%) took the programme. There was a significant difference in the proportions of GPs from the three marketing strategies who took the programme (82% telemarketing, 68% personal marketing, and 22% postal marketing). Of the 315 GPs who took the programme and were eligible to use it, 128 (41%) agreed to use the programme for three months. GPs in the postal marketing group were more likely to agree to use the programme (55% postal marketing, 44% personal marketing, and 34% telemarketing). Personal marketing was the most effective overall dissemination strategy; however, economic analysis revealed that telemarketing was the most cost-effective strategy. Costs for dissemination per GP were: 13 Pounds telemarketing, 15 Pounds postal marketing, and 88 Pounds personal marketing.
CONCLUSION: Telemarketing appeared to be the most cost-effective strategy for dissemination of SBI to GPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10756609      PMCID: PMC1313495     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  12 in total

1.  Cancer occurrence and screening in family practice. A 20-year experience.

Authors:  G N Kiernan; P S Frame
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 0.493

2.  Randomised trial of three approaches for marketing smoking cessation programmes to Australian general practitioners.

Authors:  J Cockburn; D Ruth; C Silagy; M Dobbin; Y Reid; M Scollo; L Naccarella
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-03-14

3.  Cost-effectiveness of strategies to market and train primary health care physicians in brief intervention techniques for hazardous alcohol use.

Authors:  M K Gomel; S E Wutzke; D M Hardcastle; H Lapsley; R B Reznik
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  The "Help Your Patient Stop" initiative. Evaluation of smoking prevalence and dissemination of WHO/UICC guidelines in UK general practice.

Authors:  G Fowler; D Mant; A Fuller; L Jones
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-06-03       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  A comparison of two methods to recruit physicians to deliver smoking cessation interventions.

Authors:  T E Kottke; L I Solberg; S Conn; P Maxwell; M Thomasberg; M L Brekke; M J Brekke
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-07

6.  Controlled evaluation of a general practice-based brief intervention for excessive drinking.

Authors:  R Richmond; N Heather; A Wodak; L Kehoe; I Webster
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 6.526

7.  Brief physician advice for problem alcohol drinkers. A randomized controlled trial in community-based primary care practices.

Authors:  M F Fleming; K L Barry; L B Manwell; K Johnson; R London
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-04-02       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  A RCT of three training and support strategies to encourage implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners.

Authors:  E F Kaner; C A Lock; B R McAvoy; N Heather; E Gilvarry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Screening for problem drinking and counseling by the primary care physician-nurse team.

Authors:  Y Israel; O Hollander; M Sanchez-Craig; S Booker; V Miller; R Gingrich; J G Rankin
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.455

10.  Coronary heart disease prevention: the role of the general practitioner.

Authors:  M Calnan; S Williams
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.267

View more
  6 in total

1.  Changing the culture?

Authors:  D Jewell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Changes in receptionists' attitudes towards involvement in a general practice-based trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention.

Authors:  C A Lock; E F Kaner; N Heather; E Gilvarry; B R McAvoy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Patient and practitioner characteristics predict brief alcohol intervention in primary care.

Authors:  E F Kaner; N Heather; J Brodie; C A Lock; B R McAvoy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  A RCT of three training and support strategies to encourage implementation of screening and brief alcohol intervention by general practitioners.

Authors:  E F Kaner; C A Lock; B R McAvoy; N Heather; E Gilvarry
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Screening and brief interventions for hazardous and harmful alcohol use in primary care: a cluster randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Eileen Kaner; Martin Bland; Paul Cassidy; Simon Coulton; Paolo Deluca; Colin Drummond; Eilish Gilvarry; Christine Godfrey; Nick Heather; Judy Myles; Dorothy Newbury-Birch; Adenekan Oyefeso; Steve Parrott; Katherine Perryman; Tom Phillips; Don Shenker; Jonathan Shepherd
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 6.  Screening in brief intervention trials targeting excessive drinkers in general practice: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anders Beich; Thorkil Thorsen; Stephen Rollnick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-09-06
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.