Literature DB >> 10756254

Contrast echocardiography: current and future applications.

S L Mulvagh1, A N DeMaria, S B Feinstein, P N Burns, S Kaul, J G Miller, M Monaghan, T R Porter, L J Shaw, F S Villanueva.   

Abstract

Recent updates in the field of echocardiography have resulted in improvements in image quality, especially in those patients whose ultrasonographic (ultrasound) evaluation was previously suboptimal. Intravenous contrast agents are now available in the United States and Europe for the indication of left ventricular opacification and enhanced endocardial border delineation. The use of contrast enables acquisition of ultrasound images of improved quality. The technique is especially useful in obese patients and those with lung disease. Patients in these categories comprise approximately 10% to 20% of routine echocardiographic examinations. Stress echocardiography examinations can be even more challenging, as the image acquisition time factor is critically important for accurate detection of coronary disease. Improvements in image quality with intravenous contrast agents can facilitate image acquisition and enhance delineation of regional wall motion abnormalities at the peak level of exercise. Recent phase III clinical trial data on the use of Optison and several other agents (currently under evaluation) have revealed that for approximately half of patients, image quality substantively improves, which enables the examination to be salvaged and/or increases diagnostic accuracy. For the "difficult-to-image" patient, this added information results in (1) enhanced laboratory efficiency, (2) a reduction in downstream testing, and (3) possible improvements in patient outcome. In addition, substantial research efforts are underway to use ultrasound contrast agents for assessment of myocardial perfusion. The detection of myocardial perfusion during echocardiographic examinations will permit the simultaneous assessment of global and regional myocardial structure, function, and perfusion-all of the indicators necessary to enable the optimal noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease. Despite the added benefit in improved efficacy of testing, few data exist regarding the long-term effectiveness of these agents. Currently under evaluation are the clinical and economic outcome implications of intravenous contrast agent use for daily clinical decision making in a variety of patient subsets. Until these data are known, this document offers a preliminary synthesis of available evidence on the value of intravenous contrast agents for use in rest and stress echocardiography. At present, it is the position of this guideline committee that intravenous contrast agents demonstrate substantial value in the difficult-to-image patient with comorbid conditions limiting an ultrasound evaluation of the heart. For such patients, the use of intravenous contrast agents should be encouraged as a means to provide added diagnostic information and to streamline early detection and treatment of underlying cardiac pathophysiology. As with all new technology, this document will require updates and revisions as additional data become available.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10756254     DOI: 10.1067/mje.2000.105462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  44 in total

Review 1.  Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound.

Authors:  M J Blomley; J C Cooke; E C Unger; M J Monaghan; D O Cosgrove
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-19

Review 2.  Contrast echocardiography: what have we learned from the new guidelines?

Authors:  Kevin Wei
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Novel techniques for assessment of left ventricular systolic function.

Authors:  Sonal Chandra; Hicham Skali; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Vascular lesions and s-thrombomodulin concentrations from auricular arteries of rabbits infused with microbubble contrast agent and exposed to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  James F Zachary; James P Blue; Rita J Miller; William D O'Brien
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  BSE procedure guidelines for the clinical application of stress echocardiography, recommendations for performance and interpretation of stress echocardiography: a report of the British Society of Echocardiography Policy Committee.

Authors:  H Becher; J Chambers; K Fox; R Jones; G J Leech; N Masani; M Monaghan; R More; P Nihoyannopoulos; H Rimington; R Senior; G Warton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  [Quality assurance in echocardiography. Three-level system in formation and qualifying and concept of an external quality review].

Authors:  W Fehske; T Buck; A Hagendorff; R S von Bardeleben; W Voelker; S Heinemann
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-01

7.  [Position paper on quality standards in echocardiography].

Authors:  R Hoffmann
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-12

8.  Perflutren microspheres for contrast echocardiography in a bloody pericardiocentesis.

Authors:  José E Escabí-Mendoza; Jorge D Martínez-Díaz; Eric D Avilés-Rivera
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2006

Review 9.  Cardiac imaging in the evaluation of patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.

Authors:  Jared J Wyrick; Kevin Wei
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.952

10.  The value of contrast dobutamine stress echocardiography on detecting coronary artery disease in overweight and obese patients.

Authors:  Shen-Jiang Hu; Sheng-Xiang Liu; H A Katus; M Luedde
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.223

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.