Literature DB >> 10754981

Reproductive health services in rural Washington State: scope of practice and provision of medical abortions, 1996-1997.

S A Dobie1, R A Rosenblatt, A Glusker, D Madigan, L G Hart.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study explored reproductive health care in rural Washington State, reasons given by providers for not offering abortions, and providers' willingness to use medical abortifacients.
METHODS: Physicians, midwives, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in rural Washington completed an inventory of reproductive health services that they provide, whether and why they do not perform abortions, and whether they would use medical abortifacients.
RESULTS: Of the respondents, 89.2% reported providing reproductive health care. Only 1.2% reported performing surgical abortions, and 26.1% indicated that they would probably prescribe medical abortifacients.
CONCLUSIONS: Few providers offer surgical abortions in rural Washington. Greater numbers report a willingness to prescribe medical abortifacients.

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10754981      PMCID: PMC1446202          DOI: 10.2105/ajph.90.4.624

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  10 in total

1.  Vermont physician assistants perform abortions, train residents.

Authors:  P Donovan
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct

2.  Abortion services in the United States, 1987 and 1988.

Authors:  S K Henshaw; J Van Vort
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1990 May-Jun

3.  Abortions in rural Idaho: physicians' attitudes and practices.

Authors:  R A Rosenblatt; R Mattis; L G Hart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 4.  Physician-only and physician assistant statutes: a case of perceived but unfounded conflict.

Authors:  D Lieberman; A Lalwani
Journal:  J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972)       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct

5.  Abortion services in the United States, 1991 and 1992.

Authors:  S K Henshaw; J Van Vort
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1994 May-Jun

6.  A survey of obstetrician-gynecologists' abortion attitudes and performances.

Authors:  P L Stewart
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1978-12       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Abortion attitudes and practices of family and general practice physicians.

Authors:  J M Westfall; K J Kallail; A D Walling
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 0.493

8.  RU 486: what physicians know, think and (might) do--a survey of California obstetrician/gynecologists.

Authors:  S L Heilig
Journal:  Law Med Health Care       Date:  1992

9.  Family planning service provision in rural areas: a survey in Washington State.

Authors:  S A Dobie; L Gober; R A Rosenblatt
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1998 May-Jun

10.  Factors hindering access to abortion services.

Authors:  S K Henshaw
Journal:  Fam Plann Perspect       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr
  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Medical abortion and family physicians. Survey of residents and practitioners in two Ontario settings.

Authors:  Elin Raymond; Janusz Kaczorowski; Pat Smith; John Sellors; Allyn Walsh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Managing adolescent pregnancy: The unique roles and challenges of private general practitioners in Malaysia.

Authors:  K A Malek; S Abdul-Razak; H Abu Hassan; S Othman
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2019-12-31
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.