Literature DB >> 10754625

Both EMLA and placebo cream reduced pain during extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy with the Piezolith 2300.

T Tritrakarn1, J Lertakyamanee, P Koompong, S Soontrapa, P Somprakit, A Tantiwong, S Jittapapai.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objectives were to determine whether a eutectic mixture of local anesthetic (EMLA) or placebo cream reduces pain during extracorporeal piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy (EPSWL), and to determine which of the components of the application (i.e., the occlusive dressing, the cream, or the local anesthetic) contributes to analgesia.
METHODS: A randomized, double blind, crossover study (part 1) was performed in 12 patients who were scheduled for EPSWL procedures on an ambulatory basis who received the first treatment without any intervention and who had verbal pain scores of 70 or more (on a 0-to- 100 scale). For the next two treatments at 2-week intervals, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 10 g EMLA or 10 g placebo cream and then crossed over to receive the other. The cream and occlusive dressing were left in place and immersed in water throughout the procedure. Verbal numeric pain score was assessed at 5 min after receiving the maximal tolerable intensity of shock wave and at the end of the procedure. The study continued (part 2) in 202 ambulatory patients; 125 men and 77 women, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, subjected to EPSWL were randomly allocated into five groups who received (1) nothing on the skin (control), (2) plastic occlusive dressing, (3) placebo cream and plastic occlusive dressing, (4) EMLA cream and plastic occlusive dressing, (5) EMLA cream and plastic occlusive dressing for 60 min to achieve cutaneous anesthesia, which was removed before EPSWL. Pain score was evaluated 10 min into the procedure and at the end of the procedure. RESULT: Both parts of the study showed that patients who received either EMLA or placebo cream with dressing throughout the procedure experienced less pain and tolerated higher energy levels compared with the control. Patients who received only pre-EPSWL cutaneous anesthesia of EMLA and who received only the occlusive dressing did not have a reduction in pain score.
CONCLUSIONS: EMLA and placebo creams under occlusive dressing reduced pain during EPSWL. The presence of the cream itself as a coupling medium contributed to analgesia. This may be a useful, simple, safe, and economical adjuvant technique to reduce pain during immersion EPSWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10754625     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200004000-00023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

1.  Relationship Between Patient Position and Pain Severity During Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Stones With the MODULITH SLX-F2 Lithotripter: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Jung Hun Kang; Sin Woo Lee; Sung Ho Moon; Hyun Hwan Sung; Seol Ho Choo; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2013-08-07

2.  Topical EMLA for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective, comparative, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  D Gallego Vilar; G García Fadrique; C Di Capua Sacoto; J Beltran Persiva; M Perez Mestre; J A De Francia; I Povo Martin; J Miralles Aguado; C Garau Perelló; L Sanchis Verdu; J Gallego Gomez
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-05-04

3.  Effect of the frequency of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on analgesia during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Alper Kararmaz; Sedat Kaya; Haktan Karaman; Selim Turhanoglu
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2004-07-09

Review 4.  Placebo interventions for all clinical conditions.

Authors:  Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

5.  Optimizing shock wave lithotripsy: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Paul D McClain; Jessica N Lange; Dean G Assimos
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2013

Review 6.  Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Omar M Aboumarzouk; Rami Hasan; Ali Tasleem; Martin Mariappan; Rachael Hutton; John Fitzpatrick; Laura Beatty; Gareth E Jones; Tarik Amer
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

7.  Analgesic effect of trigger point injection and EMLA for shoulder pain in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Ji Eun Kim; Ji Young Kim; Hye Sun Lee; Suhyun Seok; Hae Keum Kil
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Efficacy of Eutectic Mixture of Local Anesthetics on Pain Control During Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Shuaishuai Chai; Decai Wang; Wencheng Li; Xiaoping Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-13

9.  Analgesia for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: Current status.

Authors:  Narmada P Gupta; Anup Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2008-04

Review 10.  Placebo response and effect in randomized clinical trials: meta-research with focus on contextual effects.

Authors:  Sigurlaug H Hafliðadóttir; Carsten B Juhl; Sabrina M Nielsen; Marius Henriksen; Ian A Harris; Henning Bliddal; Robin Christensen
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 2.279

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.