| Literature DB >> 10751714 |
D D Leavitt1, M Tobler, D Gaffney, P Zhang, J Moeller.
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery has developed into a technique where patient positioning and treatment delivery can be performed with submillimeter precision. Achievement of this level of precision has allowed margins to be significantly reduced, and in some cases, removed altogether. Joined with these reductions in treatment margin has come a desire to shape the radiation beam, further limiting dose to normal tissues. Initial applications of shaped radiosurgery fields utilized circular blocking apertures in an attempt to shape the beam to these small volumes. The resultant dose distributions conformed well to spherical treatment volumes but were inadequate for situations where the volume of interest was irregular in shape. Other techniques, such as applying these circular apertures through multiple isocenter positions to a single volume, have been investigated as possible ways to better conform dose distributions to these irregularly-shaped volumes. Recent technological advances allow the use of micromultileaf collimators which dynamically shape the beam by adjustment of individual leaves as the gantry rotates through the are. With margins potentially so tight, accurate evaluation of these dynamically adjusting treatment parameters becomes critical. Our current treatment planning software evaluates adjustments of the leaf positions in increments of 10 degrees and then does a linear interpolation between increments. Treatment delivery, however, is performed with adjustment in leaf position more consistent with a 1 degree increment. This paper compares the individual position of each leaf as determined for the 10 degrees interpolation to required changes in leaf position when the calculation is performed at increments of less than 10 degrees. Our data suggest that there are instances where improvements can be seen when corrections in leaf positions are made at these smaller increments.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2000 PMID: 10751714 DOI: 10.1016/s0958-3947(99)00035-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Dosim ISSN: 1873-4022 Impact factor: 1.482