Literature DB >> 10751485

Suspected pulmonary embolism: prevalence and anatomic distribution in 487 consecutive patients. Advances in New Technologies Evaluating the Localisation of Pulmonary Embolism (ANTELOPE) Group.

W de Monyé1, M J van Strijen, M V Huisman, G J Kieft, P M Pattynama.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the prevalence and anatomic distribution of pulmonary embolism (PE) in a group of consecutive patients clinically suspected of having PE.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred eighty-seven consecutive patients clinically suspected of having PE were examined in six Dutch hospitals from May 1997 through March 1998. Patients underwent ventilation-perfusion (V-P) scintigraphy, spiral computed tomographic (CT) angiography, and/or digital subtraction pulmonary angiography according to a strict diagnostic protocol. Independent readers reviewed all of the diagnostic image studies in centralized readings. The largest pulmonary arterial branch in which PE was detected was recorded.
RESULTS: The prevalence of PE was 27% (130 of 487 patients). There was a significant difference in PE size between the high-probability and nondiagnostic V-P scans: The high-probability scans tended to depict larger emboli, but they also showed small subsegmental emboli. Twenty-nine (22%) of 130 patients had subsegmental PE; 23 of these 29 patients had a high-probability V-P scan.
CONCLUSION: The largest pulmonary arterial branch with PE was central or lobar in 66 (51%), segmental in 35 (27%), and isolated subsegmental in 29 (22%) patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10751485     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.215.1.r00ap22184

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  14 in total

1.  British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors: 
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  CTPA as the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Rosa M Estrada-Y-Martin; Sandra A Oldham
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging using the dark blood method for detecting pulmonary embolisms: comparison with computed tomography angiography.

Authors:  Mitsutomi Ishiyama; Masaki Matsusako; Katsunori Oikado; Yutaro Nishi; Kuniomi Ohi; Masaharu Hirano; Yukihisa Saida
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  Reproducibility of multi-detector spiral computed tomography in detection of sub-segmental acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  S Brunot; O Corneloup; V Latrabe; M Montaudon; F Laurent
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  CT imaging in acute pulmonary embolism: diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Joachim E Wildberger; Andreas H Mahnken; Marco Das; Axel Küttner; Michael Lell; Rolf W Günther
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Detection of central pulmonary embolism on non-contrast computed tomography: a case control study.

Authors:  Simon Sun; Alexandre Semionov; Xuanqian Xie; John Kosiuk; Benoît Mesurolle
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-04       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Detection of acute pulmonary embolism: feasibility of diagnostic accuracy of MRI using a stepwise protocol.

Authors:  Waldemar Hosch; Martin Schlieter; Sebastian Ley; Tobias Heye; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Martin Libicher
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2013-11-27

Review 8.  Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Clive Kearon
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-01-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 9.  Imaging of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Maria Komissarova; Suzanne Chong; Kirk Frey; Baskaran Sundaram
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-11-14

10.  Value of negative spiral CT angiography in patients with suspected acute PE: analysis of PE occurrence and outcome.

Authors:  C R Krestan; N Klein; D Fleischmann; A Kaneider; C Novotny; S Kreuzer; C Riedl; E Minar; K Janata; C J Herold
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.