Literature DB >> 10751157

Cranial kinesis in geckoes: functional implications.

A Herrel1, P Aerts, F De Vree.   

Abstract

Although it is generally assumed that cranial kinesis is a plesiomorphic characteristic in squamates, experimental data tend to contradict this hypothesis. In particular, coupled kinesis (i.e. streptostyly and mesokinesis) presumably arose independently in only a limited number of highly specialised groups. In this study, we investigated cranial kinesis in one of the most specialised of these groups: geckoes. On the basis of cineradiographic and electromyographic data, the fast opening and the slow closing/power stroke phases were modelled to elucidate possible functions of the observed kinesis. The results of these analyses show that the retraction of the muzzle unit during crushing is a self-reinforcing system that increases bite force and reduces the joint forces; the active protraction of the kinetic system during jaw opening, in contrast, enhances opening speed through the coupling of the intracranial units. It can be argued that cranial kinesis in geckoes is probably not an adaptive trait as such but, instead, a consequence of the 'Bauplan' of the cranial system in these animals. Presumably as a result of constructional constraints on the size of the jaw musculature and eyes, the supratemporal and postorbital bars were lost, which resulted in enormous mobility in the skull. To counteract the potential negative factors associated with this (decrease in bite force, skull damage), the kinetic system may have become coupled, and thus functional.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10751157     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.203.9.1415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  15 in total

1.  A new stem-varanid lizard (Reptilia, Squamata) from the early Eocene of China.

Authors:  Liping Dong; Yuan-Qing Wang; Qi Zhao; Davit Vasilyan; Yuan Wang; Susan E Evans
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Assessment of the role of sutures in a lizard skull: a computer modelling study.

Authors:  Mehran Moazen; Neil Curtis; Paul O'Higgins; Marc E H Jones; Susan E Evans; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A reevaluation of the anatomy of the jaw-closing system in the extant coelacanth Latimeria chalumnae.

Authors:  Hugo Dutel; Anthony Herrel; Gaël Clément; Marc Herbin
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2013-10-27

4.  Biomechanical assessment of evolutionary changes in the lepidosaurian skull.

Authors:  Mehran Moazen; Neil Curtis; Paul O'Higgins; Susan E Evans; Michael J Fagan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Do lizards and snakes really differ in their ability to take large prey? A study of relative prey mass and feeding tactics in lizards.

Authors:  Richard Shine; Jai Thomas
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2005-09-16       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  The importance of craniofacial sutures in biomechanical finite element models of the domestic pig.

Authors:  Jen A Bright
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Mechanical Transgressive Segregation and the Rapid Origin of Trophic Novelty.

Authors:  Roi Holzman; C Darrin Hulsey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Embryonic skull development in the gecko, Tarentola annularis (Squamata: Gekkota: Phyllodactylidae).

Authors:  Eraqi R Khannoon; Susan E Evans
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 2.921

9.  In Vivo Measurement of Mesokinesis in Gekko gecko: The Role of Cranial Kinesis during Gape Display, Feeding and Biting.

Authors:  Stéphane J Montuelle; Susan H Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative skull anatomy of terrestrial and crevice-dwelling Trachylepis skinks (Squamata: Scincidae) with a survey of resources in scincid cranial osteology.

Authors:  Daniel J Paluh; Aaron M Bauer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.