Literature DB >> 10751114

Treatment and outcome of severe intraventricular extension in patients with subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review of the literature.

D J Nieuwkamp1, K de Gans, G J Rinkel, A Algra.   

Abstract

Severe intraventricular hemorrhage caused by extension from subarachnoid hemorrhage or intracerebral hemorrhage leads to hydrocephalus and often to poor outcome. We conducted a systematic review to compare conservative treatment, extraventricular drainage, and extraventricular drainage combined with fibrinolysis. We carried out a search in Medline of the literature between January 1966 and December 1998 and an additional hand-search from January 1990 to December 1998. Pharmaceutical companies were contacted to gather unpublished data. We reviewed the reference lists of all relevant articles. Two authors independently assessed eligibility of the studies and extracted data on characteristics of study design, patients, and treatment. Patients with primary intraventricular hemorrhage were excluded. Main outcome measures were death and poor outcome (defined as death or dependency) at the end of follow-up. No randomized clinical trial has yet been conducted so far, and we therefore reviewed only observational studies. The case fatality rate for conservative treatment (ten studies) was 78%. For extraventricular drainage (seven studies) it was 58% [relative risk versus conservative treatment (RR) 0.74; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.99]. For extraventricular drainage with fibrinolytic agents (five studies) the case fatality rate was 6% (RR 0.08; 95% CI 0.02-0.24). The poor outcome rate for conservative treatment was 90%, that for extraventricular drainage 89% (RR 0.98; 95% CI 0.75-1.30) and that for extraventricular drainage with fibrinolytic agents 34% (RR 0.38; 95% CI 0.21-0.68). All RR values remained essentially the same after adjusting for age, sex, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons scale, study design, and year of publication for the studies that provided these data. Outcome is thus poor in patients with intraventricular extension of subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage. This meta-analysis suggests that treatment with ventricular drainage combined with fibrinolytics may improve outcome for such patients, although this impression is derived only from an indirect comparison between observational studies. A randomized clinical trial is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10751114     DOI: 10.1007/pl00007792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  49 in total

Review 1.  Intraventricular fibrinolysis for intracerebral hemorrhage with severe ventricular involvement.

Authors:  Dimitre Staykov; Juergen Bardutzky; Hagen B Huttner; Stefan Schwab
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial.

Authors:  Daniel F Hanley; Karen Lane; Nichol McBee; Wendy Ziai; Stanley Tuhrim; Kennedy R Lees; Jesse Dawson; Dheeraj Gandhi; Natalie Ullman; W Andrew Mould; Steven W Mayo; A David Mendelow; Barbara Gregson; Kenneth Butcher; Paul Vespa; David W Wright; Carlos S Kase; J Ricardo Carhuapoma; Penelope M Keyl; Marie Diener-West; John Muschelli; Joshua F Betz; Carol B Thompson; Elizabeth A Sugar; Gayane Yenokyan; Scott Janis; Sayona John; Sagi Harnof; George A Lopez; E Francois Aldrich; Mark R Harrigan; Safdar Ansari; Jack Jallo; Jean-Louis Caron; David LeDoux; Opeolu Adeoye; Mario Zuccarello; Harold P Adams; Michael Rosenblum; Richard E Thompson; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  External ventricular drainage for intraventricular hemorrhage.

Authors:  Mahua Dey; Jennifer Jaffe; Agnieszka Stadnik; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Ventricular catheter location and the clearance of intraventricular hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jennifer Jaffe; Eric Melnychuk; John Muschelli; Wendy Ziai; Timothy Morgan; Daniel F Hanley; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 5.  Spontaneous intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage: advances in minimally invasive surgery and thrombolytic evacuation, and lessons learned in recent trials.

Authors:  Mahua Dey; Agnieszka Stadnik; Issam A Awad
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.654

6.  [Secondary complications of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage].

Authors:  A Zimmer; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 0.635

7.  Hydrocephalus after intraventricular hemorrhage: the role of thrombin.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Fuyi Liu; Zhi Chen; Ya Hua; Richard F Keep; Guohua Xi
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.200

8.  Determinants of external ventricular drain placement and associated outcomes in patients with spontaneous intraventricular hemorrhage.

Authors:  Daniel B Herrick; Natalie Ullman; Saman Nekoovaght-Tak; Daniel F Hanley; Issam Awad; Shannon LeDroux; Carol B Thompson; Wendy C Ziai
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.210

9.  A treatment option for severe cerebellar hemorrhage with ventricular extension in elderly patients: intraventricular fibrinolysis.

Authors:  Jianjian Zhang; Long Wang; Zhongwei Xiong; Qingdong Han; Qidong Du; Shoujia Sun; Yu Wang; Chao You; Jincao Chen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Massive intraventricular haemorrhage from aneurysmal rupture: patient proportions and eligibility for intraventricular fibrinolysis.

Authors:  Dennis J Nieuwkamp; Bon H Verweij; Gabriël J E Rinkel
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.