Literature DB >> 10750131

Automatic threshold tracking activation without the intraoperative evaluation of the evoked response amplitude. AUTOCAP Investigators.

A Schuchert1, R Ventura, T Meinertz.   

Abstract

Automatic threshold tracking (Autocapture) controls the amplitude of the pacing pulse and adjusts it to the actual pacing threshold. The algorithm is based on the proper detection of the evoked response (ER) amplitude after the pacing pulse. For this reason an intraoperative evaluation of ER and polarization is recommended. The aims of the study were to evaluate the ER signal and polarization and the performance of automatic threshold tracking without any intraoperative testing of the ER signal. In addition, the ER amplitude was correlated with the pacing threshold, pacing impedance, spontaneous R wave amplitude, and with the clinical data. The study included 60 patients who received the VVIR pacemaker Regency connected to the Membrane E 1450/1452 pacing lead (St. Jude-Pacesetter). At implantation, a pacing threshold < 0.7 V at 0.5 ms was achieved in all patients. ER and polarization were assessed for the first time at hospital predischarge testing. Follow-up measurements were conducted at month 1, 3, and 6. The ER amplitude at hospital discharge was 8.4 +/- 4.2 mV and increased to 9.4 +/- 4.8 mV at the 6-month follow-up. The pacemaker recommended not to program automatic threshold tracking on in one patient permanently and in three patients intermittently. The ER amplitudes were not differently distributed in men compared with women or in right-sided compared to left-sided implants. The correlation between age and the evoked response was r = 0.15. The correlation between ER amplitude and pacing threshold was r = -0.08, with pacing impedance r = 0.02, and with R wave amplitude r = 0.44. In conclusion, despite no operative evaluation of the ER amplitude being performed, the mean ER amplitude was about 9 mV at 6-month follow-up. Automatic threshold tracking could be programmed on in 93% of the patients throughout the time. Neither the clinical data nor the conventional electrical parameters help to predict patients who will have low ER amplitude or to optimize the ER signal at implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10750131     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb06756.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  3 in total

Review 1.  Pacing technology: advances in pacing threshold management.

Authors:  Chu-pak Lau; Chung-wah Siu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Automatic capture verification in pacemakers (autocapture)--utility and problems.

Authors:  Ruth Kam
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2004-04-01

3.  Hemodynamic Surveillance of Ventricular Pacing Effectiveness with the Transvalvular Impedance Sensor.

Authors:  Valeria Calvi; Giovanni Pizzimenti; Marco Lisi; Giuseppe Doria; Ludovico Vasquez; Francesco Lisi; Salvatore Felis; Donatella Tempio; Alfredo Virgilio; Alberto Barbetta; Franco Di Gregorio
Journal:  Adv Med       Date:  2014-08-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.