Literature DB >> 10749962

The effect of balloon angioplasty on hypertension in atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. Dutch Renal Artery Stenosis Intervention Cooperative Study Group.

B C van Jaarsveld1, P Krijnen, H Pieterman, F H Derkx, J Deinum, C T Postma, A Dees, A J Woittiez, A K Bartelink, A J Man in 't Veld, M A Schalekamp.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertension and renal-artery stenosis are often treated with percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty. However, the long-term effects of this procedure on blood pressure are not well understood.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 106 patients with hypertension who had atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis (defined as a decrease in luminal diameter of 50 percent or more) and a serum creatinine concentration of 2.3 mg per deciliter (200 micromol per liter) or less to undergo percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty or to receive drug therapy. To be included, patients also had to have a diastolic blood pressure of 95 mm Hg or higher despite treatment with two antihypertensive drugs or an increase of at least 0.2 mg per deciliter (20 micromol per liter) in the serum creatinine concentration during treatment with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor. Blood pressure, doses of antihypertensive drugs, and renal function were assessed at 3 and 12 months, and patency of the renal artery was assessed at 12 months.
RESULTS: At base line, the mean (+/-SD) systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 179+/-25 and 104+/-10 mm Hg, respectively, in the angioplasty group and 180+/-23 and 103+/-8 mm Hg, respectively, in the drug-therapy group. At three months, the blood pressures were similar in the two groups (169+/-28 and 99+/-12 mm Hg, respectively, in the 56 patients in the angioplasty group and 176+/-31 and 101+/-14 mm Hg, respectively, in the 50 patients in the drug-therapy group; P=0.25 for the comparison of systolic pressure and P=0.36 for the comparison of diastolic pressure between the two groups); at the time, patients in the angioplasty group were taking 2.1+/-1.3 defined daily doses of medication and those in the drug-therapy group were taking 3.2+/-1.5 daily doses (P<0.001). In the drug-therapy group, 22 patients underwent balloon angioplasty after three months because of persistent hypertension despite treatment with three or more drugs or because of a deterioration in renal function. According to intention-to-treat analysis, at 12 months, there were no significant differences between the angioplasty and drug-therapy groups in systolic and diastolic blood pressures, daily drug doses, or renal function.
CONCLUSIONS: In the treatment of patients with hypertension and renal-artery stenosis, angioplasty has little advantage over antihypertensive-drug therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10749962     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200004063421403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  126 in total

Review 1.  Renovascular hypertension: screening and modern management.

Authors:  Iris Baumgartner; Lilach O Lerman
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Standard method for ultrasound evaluation of renal arterial lesions.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Med Ultrason (2001)       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.314

Review 3.  [Treatment of renal artery stenosis in the year 2021].

Authors:  Tomas Lenz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Renal artery revascularization after unsuccessful percutaneous therapy: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Kai M Balzer; S Neuschäfer; T A Sagban; D Grotemeyer; T Pfeiffer; L C Rump; W Sandmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Roll-in experience from the Cardiovascular Outcomes with Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) study.

Authors:  Timothy P Murphy; Christopher J Cooper; Donald E Cutlip; Alan Matsumoto; Kenneth Jamerson; John Rundback; Kenneth A Rosenfield; William Henrich; Joseph Shapiro; Joseph Massaro; Chen-Hsing Yen; Holly Burtch; Claudia Thum; Diane Reid; Lance Dworkin
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 6.  Diagnosis and management of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: improving patient selection and outcomes.

Authors:  Christopher J White; Jeffrey W Olin
Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-03

Review 7.  Renovascular hypertension in 2007: where are we now?

Authors:  Stephen C Textor
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  [Current management of renal artery stenosis].

Authors:  T Lenz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.743

9.  Prevalence and predictors of renal artery stenosis in patients undergoing peripheral and coronary angiography.

Authors:  Anand N Shukla; Tarun H Madan; Ashwal A Jayaram; Vivek B Kute; Jayesh R Rawal; A P Manjunath; Satyam Udhreja
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Clinical practice. Renal-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Lance D Dworkin; Christopher J Cooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.