Literature DB >> 10749259

MR imaging of the knee at 0.2 and 1.5 T: correlation with surgery.

A Cotten1, E Delfaut, X Demondion, F Lapègue, M Boukhelifa, N Boutry, P Chastanet, F Gougeon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic efficacy of low- and high-field-strength MR imagers in the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In 219 patients with suspected internal derangement of the knee, MR imaging at 0.2 and 1.5 T was performed with similar sequences. Only patients with surgically confirmed diagnosis (n = 90) were included in the statistical analysis. Radiologists were unaware of diagnosis and field strength. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, and inter- and intraobserver variability were determined.
RESULTS: There was excellent correlation between the field strengths in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus tears. Accuracy for medial meniscus, lateral meniscus, and anterior cruciate ligament tears was 91-93%, 88-90%, and 93-96%, respectively, at 0.2 T and 91-94%, 91-93%, and 97-98%, respectively, at 1.5 T. Inter- and intraobserver variability values showed excellent correlation (kappa > 0.8).
CONCLUSION: The level of diagnostic accuracy in anterior cruciate ligament tears and meniscus tears is comparable for low- and high-field-strength MR imagers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10749259     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.174.4.1741093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  17 in total

1.  Accuracy of routine magnetic resonance imaging in meniscal and ligamentous injuries of the knee: comparison with arthroscopy.

Authors:  Noha H Behairy; Mohsen A Dorgham; Sherif A Khaled
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Influence of MRI field strength on clinical decision making in knee cartilage injury - A case study.

Authors:  Glenn Cashman; Raj Attariwala
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2014-12

3.  Clinical interpretation of asymptomatic medial collateral ligament injury observed on magnetic resonance imaging in adolescent baseball players.

Authors:  Kenta Tanaka; Yoshikazu Okamoto; Takeshi Makihara; Kiyoshi Maehara; Tomohiro Yoshizawa; Manabu Minami; Masashi Yamazaki
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  A dynamic study of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using an open MRI.

Authors:  Daphne Guenoun; Julien Vaccaro; Thomas Le Corroller; Pierre-Antoine Barral; Aude Lagier; Vanessa Pauly; Benjamin Coquart; Joel Coste; Pierre Champsaur
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.246

5.  Case-control study to estimate the performance of dual-energy computed tomography for anterior cruciate ligament tears in patients with history of knee trauma.

Authors:  Katrina N Glazebrook; Lee J Brewerton; Shuai Leng; Rickey E Carter; Peter C Rhee; Naveen S Murthy; B Mathew Howe; Michael D Ringler; Diane L Dahm; Michael J Stuart; Cynthia H McCollough; J G Fletcher
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Incidence of elbow injuries in adolescent baseball players: screening by a low field magnetic resonance imaging system specialized for small joints.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Okamoto; Kiyoshi Maehara; Tetsuya Kanahori; Takashi Hiyama; Takashi Kawamura; Manabu Minami
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Pattern of joint damage in persons with knee osteoarthritis and concomitant ACL tears.

Authors:  Verena Stein; Ling Li; Grace Lo; Ali Guermazi; Yuqing Zhang; C Kent Kwoh; Charles B Eaton; David J Hunter
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 8.  [Imaging of the musculoskeletal system using low-field magnetic resonance imaging].

Authors:  Tobias Pogarell; Matthias S May; Armin M Nagel; Michael Uder; Rafael Heiss
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 0.635

9.  Mass screening for retrocochlear disorders: low-field-strength (0.2-T) versus high-field-strength (1.5-T) MR imaging.

Authors:  Frédérique Dubrulle; Julia Delomez; Alireza Kiaei; Pierre Berger; Christophe Vincent; François-Michel M Vaneecloo; Laurent Lemaitre
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  Arthroscopic and low-field MRI (0.25 T) evaluation of meniscus and ligaments of painful knee.

Authors:  Harish S Lokannavar; Xiaochun Yang; Harsha Guduru
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2012-05-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.