OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the use of combined helical CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography in the preoperative assessment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer using a unified CT and angiography system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer preoperatively underwent combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography using the unified CT and angiography system. Three radiologists independently and retrospectively reviewed the images of CT during arterial portography alone, CT hepatic arteriography alone, and combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Image review was conducted on a segment-by-segment basis; a total of 432 hepatic segments with (n = 103) 118 metastatic tumors ranging in size from 2 to 160 mm (mean, 25.8 mm) and without (n = 329) tumor were reviewed. RESULTS: Relative sensitivity of combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography (87%) was higher than that of CT during arterial portography alone (80%, p < 0.0005) and CT hepatic arteriography alone (83%, p < 0.005). Relative specificity of CT hepatic arteriography alone (95%, p < 0.0005) and combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography (96%, p < 0.0001) was higher than that of CT during arterial portography alone (91%). Diagnostic accuracy, determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, was greater with combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography than with CT during arterial portography alone (p < 0.05) or CT hepatic arteriography alone (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Using a unified CT and angiography system, we found that combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography significantly raised the detectability of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the use of combined helical CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography in the preoperative assessment of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer using a unified CT and angiography system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer preoperatively underwent combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography using the unified CT and angiography system. Three radiologists independently and retrospectively reviewed the images of CT during arterial portography alone, CT hepatic arteriography alone, and combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography. Image review was conducted on a segment-by-segment basis; a total of 432 hepatic segments with (n = 103) 118 metastatic tumors ranging in size from 2 to 160 mm (mean, 25.8 mm) and without (n = 329) tumor were reviewed. RESULTS: Relative sensitivity of combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography (87%) was higher than that of CT during arterial portography alone (80%, p < 0.0005) and CT hepatic arteriography alone (83%, p < 0.005). Relative specificity of CT hepatic arteriography alone (95%, p < 0.0005) and combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography (96%, p < 0.0001) was higher than that of CT during arterial portography alone (91%). Diagnostic accuracy, determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, was greater with combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography than with CT during arterial portography alone (p < 0.05) or CT hepatic arteriography alone (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Using a unified CT and angiography system, we found that combined CT during arterial portography and CT hepatic arteriography significantly raised the detectability of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.
Authors: S Kakeda; Y Korogi; Y Miyaguni; J Moriya; N Ohnari; N Oda; K Nishino; W Miyamoto Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-09-20 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: T Tanaka; Y Arai; Y Inaba; M Inoue; H Nishiofuku; H Anai; S Hori; H Sakaguchi; K Kichikawa Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2014-06-27 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Joseph P Erinjeri; Raphael Doustaly; Grégoire Avignon; Achiude Bendet; Elena N Petre; Etay Ziv; Hooman Yarmohammadi; Stephen B Solomon Journal: BMC Med Imaging Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 1.930