Literature DB >> 10749055

Three-dimensional Bolton-Brush Growth Study landmark data: ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the Bolton standards cohort.

D Dean1, M G Hans, F L Bookstein, K Subramanyan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of craniofacial reconstructive surgery patients may benefit from comparison to average referent three-dimensional landmark data. These data may be useful for diagnosis, treatment planning, prosthetic design, or outcomes assessment. With regard to subadult patients, we hypothesize that the pattern of ontogenetic shape change of same sex, same ethnicity, referent populations will show gross uniformity. We present a preliminary shape analysis of 50 three-dimensional landmarks derived from 317 Bolton-Brush Growth Study biorthogonal image pairs. We determine which landmarks can be collected from scanned radiographs reliably by four operators for the precisely locatable points, ontogenetic trends in landmark configuration shape change, and patterns of sexual dimorphism. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were Bolton standards individuals (16 male and 16 female) who contributed biplane cephalograms seven or more times with annual or greater spacing between ages 3 and 18 years.
DESIGN: After removing outliers, we searched for ontogenetic heterogeneity, including sexual dimorphism and within sex-specific Procrustes coordinate shape spaces.
RESULTS: A cut-off of 4.3-mm interoperator error left 32 landmarks in our analysis. Three different approaches (principal component analysis, age-trend analysis, and principal components of age residuals) all found no patterns of individual variation around sex-specific average trends of shape change. Male shape change peaks at age 15, a correlate of the growth spurt.
CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous frontal and lateral anatomic landmark identification improves three-dimensional localization reliability. Three-dimensional craniodental shape change from ages 8 to 18 within the Bolton standards presents little heterogeneity. Considerations of ethnicity aside, these may be initial grounds for use of these data as a normative referent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10749055     DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_2000_037_0145_tdbbgs_2.3.co_2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J        ISSN: 1055-6656


  5 in total

Review 1.  Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral--craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function.

Authors:  Robin J Hennessy; Stephen McLearie; Anthony Kinsella; John L Waddington
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Incorporating 3-dimensional models in online articles.

Authors:  Lucia H S Cevidanes; Antonio C O Ruellas; Julien Jomier; Tung Nguyen; Steve Pieper; Francois Budin; Martin Styner; Beatriz Paniagua
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Geometric morphometric analysis of craniofacial variation, ontogeny and modularity in a cross-sectional sample of modern humans.

Authors:  H L L Wellens; A M Kuijpers-Jagtman; D J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 4.  Three-dimensional imaging techniques: A literature review.

Authors:  Orhan Hakki Karatas; Ebubekir Toy
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2014-01

5.  Using the 3D Facial Norms Database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults.

Authors:  Matthew J Kesterke; Zachary D Raffensperger; Carrie L Heike; Michael L Cunningham; Jacqueline T Hecht; Chung How Kau; Nichole L Nidey; Lina M Moreno; George L Wehby; Mary L Marazita; Seth M Weinberg
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.027

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.