OBJECTIVE: Oro-nasal fistula is a common complication of palatoplasty. Current methods for fistula repair utilize mucoperiosteal flaps or pedicled flaps. These procedures are often cumbersome and leave a raw nasal surface, which may increase the incidence of postoperative risks and problems. In addition, the recurrence rate of the fistula is as high as 34%. We propose a simple two-layer method of fistula repair to avoid recurrences. DESIGN: A standard mucoperiosteal flap is raised on the oral side. A buccal mucosal graft is harvested from the cheeks and sutured to the nasal side of the flap that is then inset into the fistula. SETTING: Patients were either referred to the senior author's private practice (four patients) or were patients who had previously been operated on by the senior author himself (three patients). SUBJECTS: Study subjects consisted of seven patients, four males and three females, ages 14 months to 8 years. All patients had previously undergone cleft palate repair, complicated by subsequent oro-nasal fistula formation. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent oro-nasal fistula repair under general anesthesia with a local mucoperiosteal flap lined with buccal mucosal grafts placed on the nasal side of the flap. RESULTS: In all cases, the fistula was completely closed at first attempt without complications. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years, without evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed surgical procedure for fistula closure using a standard mucoperiosteal flap lined with a buccal mucosal graft is a suitable alternative for the repair of postpalatoplasty oro-nasal fistulas. Further study and long-term follow-up is needed to establish this method as a new standard form of repair.
OBJECTIVE: Oro-nasal fistula is a common complication of palatoplasty. Current methods for fistula repair utilize mucoperiosteal flaps or pedicled flaps. These procedures are often cumbersome and leave a raw nasal surface, which may increase the incidence of postoperative risks and problems. In addition, the recurrence rate of the fistula is as high as 34%. We propose a simple two-layer method of fistula repair to avoid recurrences. DESIGN: A standard mucoperiosteal flap is raised on the oral side. A buccal mucosal graft is harvested from the cheeks and sutured to the nasal side of the flap that is then inset into the fistula. SETTING:Patients were either referred to the senior author's private practice (four patients) or were patients who had previously been operated on by the senior author himself (three patients). SUBJECTS: Study subjects consisted of seven patients, four males and three females, ages 14 months to 8 years. All patients had previously undergone cleft palate repair, complicated by subsequent oro-nasal fistula formation. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent oro-nasal fistula repair under general anesthesia with a local mucoperiosteal flap lined with buccal mucosal grafts placed on the nasal side of the flap. RESULTS: In all cases, the fistula was completely closed at first attempt without complications. Patients were followed for a minimum of 2 years, without evidence of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed surgical procedure for fistula closure using a standard mucoperiosteal flap lined with a buccal mucosal graft is a suitable alternative for the repair of postpalatoplasty oro-nasal fistulas. Further study and long-term follow-up is needed to establish this method as a new standard form of repair.
Authors: Rajgopal R Reddy; Srinivas Gosla Reddy; Bhavya Banala; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Ann W Kummer; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Stefaan J Bergé Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 3.573