Literature DB >> 10748944

Visual evoked potentials related to motion-onset are modulated by attention.

I Torriente1, M Valdes-Sosa, D Ramirez, M A Bobes.   

Abstract

The effects of attention on visual evoked potentials triggered by motion-onset were examined in four experiments. A set of randomly oriented bars was used as stimuli. The first experiment showed that responses to motion-onset following pattern-onset by less than 300 ms were suppressed. In the other three experiments, the amplitude of N170 was reduced when attention was drawn away from the moving elements and towards spatially interspersed bars that remained static. The superposition of the two sets made spatial selection unlikely. These results support the existence of an attentional 'motion filter' (separating stationary from moving elements) that can operate at early stages of visual processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10748944     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00113-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Relationship between motion VEP and perceived velocity of gratings: effects of stimulus speed and motion adaptation.

Authors:  Rolf Müller; Gunder Bochmann; Mark W Greenlee; Edith Göpfert
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of feature-based attention spread: evidence from combined electroencephalographic and magnetoencephalographic recordings.

Authors:  Christian Michael Stoppel; Carsten Nicolas Boehler; Hendrik Strumpf; Ruth Marie Krebs; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Jens-Max Hopf; Mircea Ariel Schoenfeld
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  A primer on motion visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  Sven P Heinrich
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Task-specific, dimension-based attentional shaping of motion processing in monkey area MT.

Authors:  Bastian Schledde; F Orlando Galashan; Magdalena Przybyla; Andreas K Kreiter; Detlef Wegener
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view.

Authors:  Gábor Stefanics; Jan Kremláček; István Czigler
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Age-related differences in the transient and steady state responses to different visual stimuli.

Authors:  Xin Zhang; Yi Jiang; Wensheng Hou; Ning Jiang
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 5.702

7.  N170 ERPs could represent a logographic processing strategy in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Gregory Simon; Laurent Petit; Christian Bernard; Mohamed Rebaï
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-04-23       Impact factor: 3.759

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.